Stabilization of Polypropylene for Rotational Molding Applications
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rotational molding (RM) is a useful process for making large hollow objects. Due to its relatively high toughness and forgiving thermal oxidative degradation behavior, polyethylene is a most widely used material. However, it has too low elastic modulus for some important applications which leads to adaptation of polypropylene (PP) as a RM material. PP requires specially tailored antioxidant (AO) packages if it is to have any chance of surviving the often long (up to ca. 30 minutes) cycle times associated with RM. During the study the addition of the following stabilizers and antioxidants (AO) to the PP copolymer were investigated: a hindered phenolic primary AO, a phosphite secondary AO, a thioester secondary AO and a hindered amine light stabilizer. Synergistic effects between the primary and secondary AOs, as well as optimum heating times, were investigated. During the investigation formulations were prepared by compression molding and bench-scale RM. The combination resulting in the most effective synergism is the hindered phenolic primary antioxidant combined with the phosphite secondary antioxidant. A gel silica controlled release agent for the stabilizers was also investigated but did not yield significant improvements in stabilization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it