MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2272300261 · doi:10.13140/2.1.3816.4483

On the relevance of mesoscale transport for in-situ energy balance measurements

2014· article· en· W2272300261 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Matthias Mauder, Fabian Eder, Hans Peter Schmid, Ray Desjardins, Torsten Sachs, Stefan Metzger, Jörg Hartmann, Dan Yakir, Eyal Rotenberg

Bibliographic record

VenueHelmholtz-Zentrum für Polar-und Meeresforschung (Alfred-Wegener-Institut) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMesoscale meteorologyEddy covarianceBoundary layerEnergy balanceSensible heatAtmospheric sciencesTurbulencePlanetary boundary layerMeteorologyEnvironmental scienceTurbulence kinetic energyEddyGeologyMechanicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mesoscale transport of energy and matter between the \nsurface and the atmosphere often occurs in the form of \nnon-propagating turbulent organised structures or thermally- \ninduced circulations. Spatially resolving measurements \nare required to capture such fluxes and, thus far, airborne \nmeasurements are the only means to accomplish this. In \ncontrast, tower-based eddy-covariance measurements are \nconducted at one point and therefore inherently cannot \ncapture the total atmospheric exchange, which is recognised \nas a major contributor to the energy balance closure \nproblem. As long as there are mean vertical thermal and \nhumidity gradients in the atmospheric boundary layer, with \na higher potential temperature and specific humidity in the \nsurface layer than in the outer layer, such organised structures \nwill lead to a systematic underestimation of turbulent \nenergy fluxes from eddy-towers. Firstly, we address the \nquestion of how deep such meso-γ scale motions penetrate \ninto the surface layer. We present indications from Doppler- \nLiDAR, airborne and tower-based measurements, which \nshow that mesoscale motions can indeed be found quite \nclose to the surface, but the mesoscale effect vanishes \nwhen measurements are actually conducted within the \nroughness sublayer and when shear stress is sufficiently \nlarge to break up mesoscale contributions into smaller \neddies. This is illustrated by observations from Germany \nand Israel. Secondly, we investigate whether the common \npractice of adjusting the measured eddy tower fluxes for \nenergy balance closure by conserving the Bowen ratio is \nsupported by experimental evidence. Mesoscale and smallscale \nturbulent fluxes from four different flight campaigns \nare presented, which were carried out on board of the \nCanadian Twin Otter (National Research Council of Canada) \nand the German Polar 5 (Alfred-Wegener Institute) research \naircraft over different landscapes in Canada and Alaska.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHelmholtz-Zentrum für Polar-und Meeresforschung (Alfred-Wegener-Institut)→Same topicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows→French-language works237,207→