MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2272359140 · doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsv175

Patchiness in American lobster benthic recruitment at a hierarchy of spatial scales

2015· article· en· W2272359140 on OpenAlexaffabout
Guðjón Már Sigurðsson, Michael John. Tremblay, Rémy Rochette

Bibliographic record

VenueICES Journal of Marine Science · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCoral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
Canadian institutionsBedford Institute of OceanographyFisheries and Oceans CanadaUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBenthic zoneCobbleSpatial ecologySpatial variabilityEcologyHabitatScale (ratio)GeographyTemporal scalesEnvironmental scienceBiologyCartographyStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The overarching goal of ecology is to uncover natural patterns and the processes that underlie them. Importantly, both patterns and processes are dependent on scale. In this study, we assessed spatial patterns in benthic recruitment (density of young-of-year within a few months post-settlement) of American lobster in the Canadian Gulf of Maine by deploying, over 3 consecutive years, between 413–505 cobble-filled collectors on structurally complex cobble bottom in a spatially nested design: regions (127 and 674 km 2 ), areas within regions (0.4–4 km 2 ), sites within areas (0.003–0.23 km 2 ), and “sub-sites” within sites (0.00004–0.06 km 2 ). We quantified spatial patterns of benthic recruitment using a repeated-measures nested ANOVA, variance component analysis and a randomization approach developed for this study. These analyses indicated that the area scale (0.4–4 km 2 ) was most important to patchiness in benthic recruitment, with a significant but smaller amount of variation in recruitment at the region scale (127 and 674 km 2 ), and virtually no significant variation at the smaller spatial scales. Despite interannual variability in benthic recruitment, these spatial patterns and scales of patchiness were largely consistent across years. Of the 11 study areas surveyed, 3 were identified as recruitment “hotspots” and 4 as recruitment “coldspots”, based on density frequency distributions. The location of these different recruitment “hotspots” and “coldspots” suggests that patchiness at the area scale may be related to the effect of local currents and topographical features on larval retention. The lack of significant patchiness at the smallest scale of the collector is at first surprising, given previous work on substrate selection by competent post-larvae, but likely arose because our sampling tool offered a standard and high-quality substrate, indirectly confirming the importance of substrate to small-scale patterns of benthic recruitment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.100
Threshold uncertainty score0.198

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueICES Journal of Marine ScienceSame topicCoral and Marine Ecosystems StudiesFrench-language works237,207