MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 19104: The Relationship of Parent Well-Being, Family Management, and Service Utilization in Families of Children With Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome From the Perspective of Mothers and Fathers

2013· article· en· W2272625762 on OpenAlexaff
Ross T Ballantyne, Tamara L. Dorfman, Nicole Dahl, Laura G. Rogers, Joyce Magill‐Evans, Andrew S. Mackie, Gwen R. Rempel

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsAthabasca UniversityUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHypoplastic left heart syndromePerspective (graphical)PediatricsHeart defectIntensive care medicineInternal medicineHeart disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Given the prevelance of neurodevelopmental impairments in children with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS), and recommendations that they have early intervention, parents’ patterns of service utilization for their at-risk child warrants investigation. The purpose of this study was to (1) delineate parent, child, and family needs from the perspective of parents, and (2) identify the services and resources used and needed by parents to support themselves, their children, and their family. Method: Descriptive study employing the Family Management Measure (FaMM), Connor-Davison Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), Parenting Stress Index (PSI), Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scales (VABS) and Education and Rehabilitation Services Questionnaire (ERSQ). Findings: Questionnaires were sent to 64 families. Thirty-four parents, 21 mothers and 13 fathers, from 22 families returned questionnaires ( 38% response rate). Mean age of the children was 4.81 years (range 13 months to 15 years). There was no significant difference between the resilience of mothers and fathers, with 5/32 (19%) scoring in the post-traumatic stress category. For parenting stress, 10 of 30 (33%) of parents scored in the clinically significant range. Ten of 24 (41%) parents fell into the problematic family management category. Half of the children on the Vineland had typical or above average mean scores. Four of the 22 children living with severe morbidities were receiving education and rehabilitation services. Children with mild to moderate morbidities, including inattention, learning and behavior difficulties, progressive hearing loss and sensory issues, were not receiving adequate services. Minimal community-based services for parents were reported. Conclusion: The presence of an impairment such as HLHS does not predict service needs or outcomes from a functional perspective. Rather, persistent comorbidities have distinct meaning for each child, parent, and family. Therefore, when considering intervention for both the child and the parent, it is important to consider parents’ perceptions the child’s limitations and community participation and how these perceptions influence their parenting processes, especially related to service utilization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCongenital Heart Disease Studies→French-language works237,207→