MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2273644174 · doi:10.1161/str.44.suppl_1.atp175

Abstract TP175: Impact of Living Alone on Stroke Outcomes: Results from the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network

2013· article· en· W2273644174 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mathew J. Reeves, Jiming Fang, Marla Prager, Moira K. Kapral

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStroke (engine)DyslipidemiaLogistic regressionDiabetes mellitusActivities of daily livingInternal medicineEmergency medicinePediatricsGerontologyPhysical therapyObesity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Social isolation is a risk factor for poor health outcomes and living alone is a commonly used proxy measure for social isolation. We examined the relationships between living alone and stroke outcomes in patients enrolled in the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network. Methods: Between 2003-2008, 24526 patients with ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, or TIA were admitted to 11 Ontario registry hospitals. Patients not living at home (n= 7364), repeat stroke admissions (n=1246) or with missing data (n= 1946) were excluded. Outcomes included onset to arrival time ≤2.5 hrs, discharge to home, mortality (in-hospital, 30-day, 1-year, 3-year), and readmission (1-year). The independent effects of living alone on outcomes were determined using multivariable logistic regression. Results: Overall, 22.5% (n= 3146/13970) of patients were living alone at home prior to admission. Compared to patients living at home with others, patients living alone were significantly more likely to be ≥80 years of age (41.6% vs. 28.8%), female (62.7% vs. 41.4%), white (58.9% vs. 53.7%), widowed (53.5% vs. 11.5%), or single (21.7% vs. 3.7%), and significantly less likely to have diabetes (21.8% vs. 24.8%) or dyslipidemia (32.2% vs. 37.3%). The prevalence of severe stroke was similar (12.4% vs. 14.9%). Patients living alone were less likely to arrive ≤2.5 hrs after onset (32.9% vs. 42.7%) or be discharged to home (61.1% vs. 68.2%), however, differences in mortality or readmission rates were minimal (Table). Adjustment for confounding variables did not appreciably change these results. Conclusions: Patients living alone had delayed hospital arrival and were less likely to return home, but were not at increased risk of death or readmission. Further research is needed to understand the inter-relationships between living alone, social isolation, and poor stroke outcomes, especially given the increasing prevalence of living alone in developed countries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery→French-language works237,207→