<i>In situ</i>nanojoining of Y- and T-shaped silver nanowires structures using femtosecond laser radiation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report the in situ joining of spatially separated silver nanowires without additional filler material by controlled irradiation with femtosecond laser pulses. Nanojoining under these conditions arises from highly localized heat generation in the vicinity of the gap between adjacent silver nanowires. Melting, followed by the flow of silver into the gap, is optimized by adjusting the direction of laser polarization relative to gap geometry. Our results show that melting of silver occurs on both nanowires in the vicinity of the gap between the two components. Successful formation of a joint is found to be a function of the angle between the long axis of the nanowires and the gap distance. Finite element simulations show that the strong localized electric field generated by optical excitation determines the location and the morphology of the resulting bond. Light coupling and the resulting emission properties of these Y-shaped nanowire structures have been simulated and are compared to similar structures where the gap remains open. It is suggested that joined Y-shaped couplers will have a higher switching ratio between emitted nanowire ends than those occurring in open-gap structures. Nanojoining induced by localized heating under strong field excitation may enable the production of robust branched metal nanowire structures for optical applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it