AT<sub>1</sub> receptor blockers prevent sympathetic hyperactivity and hypertension by chronic ouabain and hypertonic saline
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sympathetic hyperactivity and hypertension caused by chronic treatment with ouabain or sodium-rich artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF) can be prevented by central administration of an angiotensin type 1 (AT(1)) receptor blocker. In the present study, we assessed whether, in Wistar rats, chronic peripheral treatment with the AT(1) receptor blockers losartan and embusartan can exert sufficient central effects to prevent these central effects of ouabain and sodium. Losartan or embusartan (both at 100 mg x kg(-1) x day(-1)) were given subcutaneously once daily. Ouabain (50 microg/day) was infused subcutaneously, and sodium-rich aCSF (1.2 M Na(+), 5 microl/h) was infused intracerebroventricularly, both by osmotic minipump for 13-14 days. The mean arterial pressure (MAP) at rest and in response to air stress and intracerebroventricularly injection of guanabenz (75 microg/7.5 microl), ANG II (30 ng/3 microl), and ouabain (0.5 microg/2 microl) were then measured. In control rats, chronic treatment with ouabain subcutaneously and hypertonic saline intracerebroventricularly both increased baseline MAP by 20-25 mmHg and enhanced twofold the pressor responses to air stress and depressor responses to the alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonist guanabenz. Simultaneous treatment with losartan or embusartan fully prevented hypertension, maintained normal responses to air stress and guanabenz, and attenuated pressor responses to acute intracerebroventricular injection of ANG II and ouabain. We concluded that peripheral administration of losartan as well as embusartan can cause sufficient central effects to prevent the sympathetic hyperactivity and hypertension induced by chronic peripheral ouabain and central sodium.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".