MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2274228328 · doi:10.1353/vpr.2015.0019

Periodicals and Journalism in Twentieth-Century Ireland: Writing against the Grain ed. by Mark O’Brien and Felix M. Larkin (review)

2015· article· en· W2274228328 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Elizabeth Tilley

Bibliographic record

VenueVictorian periodicals review · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIrish and British Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNewspaperJournalismPoliticsIrishIndependence (probability theory)HistoryMedia studiesArt historyClassicsSociologyLawPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Periodicals and Journalism in Twentieth-Century Ireland: Writing against the Grain ed. by Mark O’Brien and Felix M. Larkin Elizabeth Tilley Mark O’Brien and Felix M. Larkin, eds., Periodicals and Journalism in Twentieth-Century Ireland: Writing against the Grain (Dublin: Four Courts Press, 2014), pp. 240, $74.50/£49.18/€55.00 cloth. The essays in this collection are expanded versions of papers given at the 2012 conference of the Newspaper and Periodical History Forum of Ireland at Kingston University. Fourteen chapters discuss significant titles from 1899 to 1990, emphasizing connections between newspapers, periodicals, and journalism in the broadest sense. Many of the contributors have close associations with the newspaper trade in Ireland. The remit of the book is to evaluate the cultural presence of a selection of titles and to judge “their journalistic activities—and, by extension, their contributions to Irish society and political culture” (11). This is media history, and the journals chosen for study are, as the editors say, representative rather than famous, “best,” or most long-lived. [End Page 287] The first essay, by Colum Kenny of Dublin City University, is the most useful to scholars of nineteenth-century periodicals. Kenny’s argument addresses the succession of journals that Arthur Griffith (1871–1922) managed, owned, or wrote for. These six titles were published from 1899 to 1919, each closing down before the next began publication. As they all appeared during the fight for political independence from Britain, Kenny traces their nationalist outlook and examines how the British government responded to their perceived threat. For example, Kenny notes that Maud Gonne wrote an article in Griffith’s United Ireland about Queen Victoria’s visit to Ireland in 1900, describing her as the “Famine Queen” (19). The government’s response was to seize all copies of the paper containing Gonne’s article. United Ireland was itself lost in 1906 when Griffith unsuccessfully fought a libel action brought against the paper by a Limerick parish priest; however, the nationalist cause was reborn in Griffith’s new publication, Sinn Féin, published from 1906 to 1914, and a pattern of resistance and governmental reprisal was established. In each of these essays, the focus is on content over form, so it is difficult to get a sense of what the journals actually looked like, and little attempt is made to establish facts such as circulation figures or target audiences—beyond the broad category “nationalist.” It is clear, however, that the collection is an attempt to revive the study of periodicals in Ireland, and the annual conferences of the Newspaper and Periodical History group will undoubtedly result in more nuanced examinations of titles from a wider historical and political field. Elizabeth Tilley National University of Ireland, Galway Copyright © 2015 The Research Society for Victorian Periodicals

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0090.008
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVictorian periodicals reviewSame topicIrish and British StudiesFrench-language works237,207