Periodicals and Journalism in Twentieth-Century Ireland: Writing against the Grain ed. by Mark O’Brien and Felix M. Larkin (review)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reviewed by: Periodicals and Journalism in Twentieth-Century Ireland: Writing against the Grain ed. by Mark O’Brien and Felix M. Larkin Elizabeth Tilley Mark O’Brien and Felix M. Larkin, eds., Periodicals and Journalism in Twentieth-Century Ireland: Writing against the Grain (Dublin: Four Courts Press, 2014), pp. 240, $74.50/£49.18/€55.00 cloth. The essays in this collection are expanded versions of papers given at the 2012 conference of the Newspaper and Periodical History Forum of Ireland at Kingston University. Fourteen chapters discuss significant titles from 1899 to 1990, emphasizing connections between newspapers, periodicals, and journalism in the broadest sense. Many of the contributors have close associations with the newspaper trade in Ireland. The remit of the book is to evaluate the cultural presence of a selection of titles and to judge “their journalistic activities—and, by extension, their contributions to Irish society and political culture” (11). This is media history, and the journals chosen for study are, as the editors say, representative rather than famous, “best,” or most long-lived. [End Page 287] The first essay, by Colum Kenny of Dublin City University, is the most useful to scholars of nineteenth-century periodicals. Kenny’s argument addresses the succession of journals that Arthur Griffith (1871–1922) managed, owned, or wrote for. These six titles were published from 1899 to 1919, each closing down before the next began publication. As they all appeared during the fight for political independence from Britain, Kenny traces their nationalist outlook and examines how the British government responded to their perceived threat. For example, Kenny notes that Maud Gonne wrote an article in Griffith’s United Ireland about Queen Victoria’s visit to Ireland in 1900, describing her as the “Famine Queen” (19). The government’s response was to seize all copies of the paper containing Gonne’s article. United Ireland was itself lost in 1906 when Griffith unsuccessfully fought a libel action brought against the paper by a Limerick parish priest; however, the nationalist cause was reborn in Griffith’s new publication, Sinn Féin, published from 1906 to 1914, and a pattern of resistance and governmental reprisal was established. In each of these essays, the focus is on content over form, so it is difficult to get a sense of what the journals actually looked like, and little attempt is made to establish facts such as circulation figures or target audiences—beyond the broad category “nationalist.” It is clear, however, that the collection is an attempt to revive the study of periodicals in Ireland, and the annual conferences of the Newspaper and Periodical History group will undoubtedly result in more nuanced examinations of titles from a wider historical and political field. Elizabeth Tilley National University of Ireland, Galway Copyright © 2015 The Research Society for Victorian Periodicals
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".