MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2274367807 · doi:10.14288/1.0062022

An investigation of ligand-exchange as a method for the extraction and concentration of dissolved organic matter from seawater

2011· article· en· W2274367807 on OpenAlexaff
Roger Pocklington

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeawaterExtraction (chemistry)Dissolved organic carbonOrganic matterChemistryEnvironmental scienceLigand (biochemistry)Environmental chemistryChromatographyOceanographyGeologyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The technique of ligand-exchange was investigated as a possible method for the extraction and concentration of organic compounds dissolved in seawater. Cation-exchange resins in transition metal forms were used to extract carboxylate anions and amino-acids from dilute solution in synthetic seawater. The optimum conditions found from small-scale experiments were applied to the extraction of ¹⁴C-labelled amino-acids from natural seawater. This work demonstrated (1) the strong bonding of transition-metal ions., especially Fe(iii), to the chelating resin Dowex A-1 (2) the sorption of citrate, tartrate, glycine and glutamate by Dowex A-1 in Fe(iii) form (3) the sorption of glutamate and alanine by the same resin in Ni(NH₃)₃. and Cu(NH₃) form (4) the displacement of the organic ligands by inorganic reagents: 2M KH₂PO₄ in the case of Fe(iii) and 30% ammonia in the case of Ni(NH₃)₃ and Cu(NH₃) forms. It was concluded that the method is of marginal utility for the first-stage extraction of organic ligands from seawater. The relationship of the experimental results to tabulated Stability Constants of Transition-metal complexes with organic ligands is briefly discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.468
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicWater Quality Monitoring and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207