Pb-free PBGA Design Points to Improve Handling Robustness
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pb-Free BGA solder joints are more brittle and more susceptible to interfacial fails than the leaded versions. These brittle failures typically occur if the modules are subjected to high strain rates through module handling impacts or PCB flexural stress. The high speed ball shear technique is a useful method to submit solder joints to high strain rates in a controlled manner to emulate the levels of strain the BGAs may see in handling. This measurement technique was used to evaluate different laminate design and process variables on organic laminate substrates to create a more robust Pb-Free solder joint. Experiments were conducted to evaluate the effects and interactions of laminate, module assembly process, SAC alloy composition, and thermal treatments. Modulations of shear speed and shear angle made it possible to observe transitions from ductile to brittle solder fractures. The high speed ball shear method was successful to differentiate subtle effects resulting from different design points and process variables. The copper composition in the PbFree solder alloy, thermal history, and geometric factors such as solder volume, solder resist opening and solder resist thickness all had measurable impacts on the shear strength and transition point of ductile to brittle failure. Some BGA configurations have also been tested in reliability, namely in thermal cycling, and were shown to meet application requirements. Optimal design points can therefore be applied to enhance handling robustness without compromising on reliability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".