MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Delayed−Release Dimethyl Fumarate and Pregnancy: Preclinical Studies and Pregnancy Outcomes Reported During the Clinical Development Program (S24.006)

2014· article· en· W2274638781 on OpenAlexaff
Ralf Gold, J. Theodore Phillips, Eva Havrdová, Amit Bar‐Or, Ludwig Kappos, Janet Clarke, Huixing Yuan, Mark Novas, Jie Li, Marianne T. Sweetser, Nuwan Kurukulasuriya, Vissia Viglietta, Robert Fox

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and Medication Impact
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPregnancyMedicineGynecology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Present preclinical data from animal reproductive toxicology studies and the outcomes of pregnancies occuring during the delayed-release dimethyl fumarate (DMF) clinical development program. BACKGROUND: No formal studies of delayed-release DMF were conducted in pregnant women, but pregnancies have occurred during the clinical development program. DESIGN/METHODS: Reproductive and developmental toxicology was evaluated in rats and rabbits. Delayed-release DMF clinical studies included 2,665 MS patients, 320 psoriasis patients, 101 rheumatoid arthritis patients, and 338 healthy volunteers. Subjects were required to use reliable contraception and immediately discontinue drug in the event of pregnancy. Pregnancy outcomes as of January 2, 2013 (data cutoff) are reported in this abstract; outcomes as of January, 2014 will be presented. RESULTS: There was no evidence of impaired fertility in rats or teratogenicity in rats and rabbits given dimethyl fumarate at doses that caused reductions in maternal weight gain. As of January 2, 2013, 38 pregnancies in delayed-release DMF recipients (37 MS patients, 1 healthy volunteer) and 14 pregnancies in placebo recipients were reported in clinical studies. Information is pending for three delayed-release DMF recipients and one was lost to follow-up; hence, results for delayed-release DMF are reported for the 34 pregnancies with known outcomes. In patients exposed to delayed-release DMF, 22 live births (64.7%), 3 spontaneous abortions (8.8%), and 9 elective terminations (26.5%) were reported. In placebo recipients, 9 live births (64.3%), 3 spontaneous abortions (21.4%), and 2 elective terminations (14.3%) were reported. No fetal abnormalities were reported. The incidence of spontaneous abortion was consistent with the expected rate of early pregnancy loss in the general population (12-22%). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the available data, no increased risk of fetal abnormalities or adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with gestational exposure to delayed-release DMF during the first trimester has been observed. Further data will be collected through a pregnancy registry. Study supported by: Biogen Idec, Inc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurology→Same topicPregnancy and Medication Impact→French-language works237,207→