Canada's Champion Regimental Band: A Critical Study of the Musicianship of the Band of the 85th Overseas Battalion, C. E. F., Nova Scotia Highlanders;
Bibliographic record
Abstract
HOUGH the following essay is a contribution to the criticism of music, particularly Martial Music, in Canada, a perusal of its contents will, as was designej, ih its way and degree, teach a reader HOW TO LISTEN, not, as too many do, merely with the ears and "with the eyes ", but with critical appreciation, to.a military band which plays, artistically and engagingly, Concert, as well as Martial, music.If the essay in kny degree does this, and if, further, it spurs other Canadian Bands, military and civilian, to attain to better instrumentation and musicianship, it will, a s was also designed, have achieved a worthy purpose, and have justified its publication.For those not a t all, or but slightly acquainted, with the notation, theory, and aesthetics of music, I have alded (p.VIII) a Glossary of Musical Terms used in the text of the essay, to help them the more readily to understand the text-thouzh, in fact, there is nothing really difficult in it.Some may object to so colloquial and unaesthetic an epithet ao " Champion " being applied to a musical organization.I have, however, excellent precedent.The epithet was once applied, in a magazine essay, to the world-famous Mendelssohn Choir of Toronto, by
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".