Ce que débattre veut dire. Procédures de débat public et légitimité de la décision dans le champ de l'utilité publique: Rapport final de la recherche pour le programme « Concertation-Décision-Environnement » du Ministère de l'écologie et du développement durable
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although the institutionalization of the public debate is the result of planning conflicts and is understood in social practice as the creation of new democratic rights, legislative texts and political decision-making processes do not see it as a response to a problem of democracy, but rather as a way of making decisions more effective. This opposition on the aims of participation - the inhabitants' aspiration to be heard vs. the law's aim to modernize - structures the relationships between public participation, deliberation, project development and decision-making. In order to account for this social construction, the “What debating means” research did not focus on the analysis of the institutionalization process, but took the approach of studying "the ever-open and 'under tension' character of the democratic experience" (Rosanvallon, 2002). More precisely, in order to link in the same approach the institutionalization process, the meaning that citizens give to their involvement in planning conflicts, and what they are experiencing in public debate, the research has deepened three themes. They have not been studied much elsewhere: learning shaped by a deliberative moment in the decision-making process; political experience of the participants in a deliberative process; and contributions of economic theory to the analysis of the deliberation. From this in-depth study and from the Franco-Quebec comparison of the BAPE and CNDP experiences, the research draws an approach to evaluating public debate in its link to decision-making. The first part formalizes the dynamics resulting from the organization of the debate, and the second part the production of the debate. The characterization of its production then makes it possible to indicate under what conditions the dynamics of the debate can influence the decision-making process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".