MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2275136946

Abstract: A geological map of the Jurassic North Mountain Basalt, southern Nova Scotia: a 200 km transect from Cape Split to Brier Island

2006· article· en· W2275136946 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Daniel J. Kontak

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyBasaltRhyoliteTransectGeochemistryGeomorphologyTerranePaleontologyVolcanic rockVolcano
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The fi rst regional map showing the distribution of the three fl ow units comprising the Jurassic North Mountain Basalt from Cape Split southwestward to Brier Island is presented. Along this 200 km traverse the NMB is divided into three continuous volcanological fl ow units that have a ca. 500 m aggregate thickness and are referred to as the lower(LFU), middle(MFU) and upper(UFU) units. Exceptional volcanological features of the units are displayed along continuous cliff faces bordering the Bay of Fundy and in numerous quarries. The LFU (≤180 m) is a massive, medium-grained, dominantly holocrystalline basalt with well-developed polygonal jointing (i.e., columnar joints ≤2 m) of colonnade and complex entablature patterns. Several features distinguish the upper part of the fl ow: (1) the upper 5–10 m is fi ner grained and rarely red-brown; (2) the upper 5–10 m may be amygdaloidal; and (3) layered pegmatites locally occur in the upper 30–40 m. These sheet-like layers (≤2–5 cm to ≤1–3 m) are comb-textured and pyroxene-rich with a granophyric matrix and concordant or discordant rhyolite or granophyre seams (≤3 cm) occur. The presence of circular structures, now water-fi lled in some cases, along the central and western parts of the map area may refl ect outpouring of the LFU over water-rich surfaces resulting in formation of rootless cones. The MFU (≤165 m) contains multiple (≤15–20), thin (≤15–20 m), geometrically-complex fl ow sheets with abundant, zonally-arranged vesicles, now zeolite occluded (i.e., amygdules). Abundant fi eld evidence (e.g, fl ow lobes, stacked lobes, vesicle zonation, tumulis) indicate the MFU consists of infl ated pahoehoe fl ow sheets that formed over days to a few months, but red-brown oxidized tops and “neptunian” dykes in the upper half of fl ows indicate a time hiatus between fl ows. The UFU (≤150 m) contains ≤30–40% mesostasis in a medium-grained, ophitic-textured host. This unit consists of 1 or 2 fl ow sheets and also has colonnade style, polygonal jointing (≤1 m). The lower 10–20 m of the UFU locally contains felsic material (ca. 65–74 wt. % SiO2) in the form of dykes, amoeboid masses and spectacular segregation pipes (3–60 cm; ≤10–15/m2) that are sometimes cored by agate and crystalline silica. The distribution on the fl ow units shows several notable features: (1) the surface exposure of the LFU broads to three times its width in the western part of the map to 3 km; (2) coincident with the latter is a change in thickness (20–35 m to 165 m), number of fl ow sheets (4–6 to 15–20) and

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.126
Threshold uncertainty score0.253

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→