MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Protective Actions of 5‐HT <sub>4</sub> Receptors in the Colonic Epithelium

2016· article· en· W2275362565 on OpenAlexaff
Stephanie N. Spohn, R. Scott, Conor O’Neill, Cathy MacNaughton, Michael Dicay, Francesca Bianco, Elena Bonora, Brigitte Lavoie, Rebecca Wilcox, Roberto De Giorgio, Wallace K. MacNaughton, Keith A. Sharkey, Gary M. Mawe

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal motility and disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTegaserodAgonistReceptorColitisInternal medicine5-HT4 receptorEndocrinologyMucusReceptor antagonistPharmacologyChemistryMedicineBiologyAntagonistIrritable bowel syndrome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

5‐HT 4 receptors are expressed in colonic epithelium, and activation with 5‐HT 4 receptor agonists causes mucus secretion from goblet cells, chloride secretion from enterocytes, and 5‐HT release from enterochromaffin cells. We tested whether this receptor could serve a protective role in models of colitis and under basal conditions. CD‐1 mice were given DSS (4% w/v for 5 days in drinking water) or TNBS (7.5 mg/mL) on day 0. 5‐HT 4 receptor agonist (Tegaserod, 1mg/kg), vehicle, or antagonist (GR 113808) plus agonist was delivered by enema daily day 1–7 (prevention) or day 6–15 (recovery) to determine the effects of epithelial 5‐HT 4 receptor activation in colitis. To test the actions of 5‐HT 4 receptors under basal conditions, GR 113808 was administered to normal mice by enema for 10 days. Colitis was evaluated using disease activity index (DAI) and histological damage scores (HDS). Possible protective actions such as cell proliferation in colonic tissue and migration and resistance to oxidative stress in CaCo‐2 cell culture were also explored. To investigate function, we evaluated propulsive motility in the guinea pig distal colon. Intraluminal tegaserod treatment in both DSS and TNBS‐inflamed animals significantly attenuated the development of, and accelerated the recovery from, colitis in an antagonist‐sensitive manner. However, administration of Tegaserod (1 mg/kg) by intraperitoneal injection had no effect. TNBS‐induced dysmotility in guinea pigs was reversed by 5‐HT 4 receptor agonist treatment, and this action was blocked by the atagonist. Increased cell proliferation was detected in the form of increased Ki‐67 immunoreactivity in crypts of inflamed animals treated with Tegaserod. We also observed areas of accelerated healing of scratches and increased resistance to H 2 O 2 induced oxidative stress in CaCo‐2 cells. Interestingly, antagonist treatment alone in normal mice resulted in significant increases in DAI, HDS, and bacterial translocation in mice, as well as disrupted motility patterns in guinea pig colon. In summary, activation of 5‐HT 4 receptors on the colonic epithelium reduces the development of, and accelerates recovery from, colitis. It is likely acting through increased wound healing by increased cell migration and cell proliferation, as well as resistance to apoptosis. Additionally, 5‐HT 4 receptor activation protects colonic motility. Taken together, these data suggest that epithelial 5‐HT 4 receptors have a protective effect in the normal and inflamed colon. Support or Funding Information Funded by DK62267

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicGastrointestinal motility and disordersFrench-language works237,207