MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2275561381

Five Hundred 5.25-Inch Discs and One (Finicky) Machine: A Report on a Legacy E-Records Pilot Project at the Archives of Ontario

2011· article· en· W2275561381 on OpenAlex
Charles Levi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueArchivaria (Association of Canadian Archivists) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital and Cyber Forensics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLibrary scienceSubject (documents)HumanitiesUSableReading (process)Computer scienceWorld Wide WebHistoryArtPolitical scienceLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Il existe un vaste corpus de textes thoriques portant sur le sujet des documents numriques, de leur authenticit et des problmes lis leur gestion.Cependant, il existe une lacune au niveau des compte rendus du traitement des documents numriques, surtout en ce qui a trait aux documents numriques patrimoniaux sur disquettes.En 2008, les Archives de l'Ontario ont lanc un projet-pilote sur les documents numriques afin d'analyser les problmes engendrs par ces disquettes.Jusqu' maintenant, on a valu plus de cinq cents disquettes 5,25 pouces, six cents disquettes 3,5 pouces, cinquante cdroms, deux lecteurs ZIP et plusieurs autres mdias.Bien qu'on ait connu un succs considrable avec l'utilisation des lecteurs de disquettes 3,5 pouces externes, le dfi de maintenir un lecteur de disquettes 5,25 pouces fonctionnel se poursuit.Ce texte rend compte de : 1) le progrs du projet des documents numriques; 2) les problmes relis la lecture et l'valuation des fichiers lectroniques, y compris ceux qui ne sont plus supports ou qui sont de format obsolte; 3) l'investigation lgale pousse des logiciels; 4) les nouveaux dveloppements possibles dans le domaine du matriel informatique.L'accent est plac sur la rcupration de l'information plutt que sur la prservation des mdias archaques.ABSTRACT There is a vast amount of theoretical literature on the subject of electronic records, their authenticity, and problems with their management.There is, however, a lack of practical reporting on the processing of electronic materials, especially legacy e-records on floppy disk.In 2008 the Archives of Ontario initiated an e-records pilot project to analyze the issues arising from these floppy disks.To date, over five hundred 5.25-inch floppy disks, six hundred 3.5-inch disks, fifty CD-ROMs, two zip-drives, and a variety of other media have been appraised.Although there has been considerable success in the use of 3.5-inch external disk drives, the struggle to maintain a usable 5.25-inch disk reader has been ongoing.This paper reports on: 1) the progress of the erecords project; 2) the issues involved in reading and assessing computer files, including those of currently unsupported and obsolete formats; 3) advanced software forensics; and 4) possible future hardware developments.The focus is on the recovery of informa tion as opposed to the preservation of archaic media.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.811
Threshold uncertainty score0.829

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it