MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2275687740 · doi:10.1525/jams.2010.63.3.652

Review: Imposing Harmony: Music and Society in Colonial Cuzco by Geoffrey Baker

2010· article· en· W2275687740 on OpenAlexaff
Grayson Wagstaff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Musicological Society · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLatin American history and culture
Canadian institutionsCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Music Media and Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHarmony (color)ColonialismHarmony (Music)ArtAestheticsArt historyHistoryLiteratureVisual artsArchaeologyMusical

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Book Review| December 01 2010 Review: Imposing Harmony: Music and Society in Colonial Cuzco by Geoffrey Baker Imposing Harmony: Music and Society in Colonial Cuzco, by Geoffrey Baker. Durham, NC, and London: Duke University Press, 2008. x, 308 pp. Grayson Wagstaff Grayson Wagstaff GRAYSON WAGSTAFF is Professor and Dean of the Benjamin T. Rome School of Music at The Catholic University of America in Washington, DC. His research emphasizes sacred music in late Medieval and Early Modern Spain and early Colonial Mexico. His book Matins for the Dead in Sixteenth-Century Colonial Mexico (Institute of Mediaeval Music) was released in 2007. Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Journal of the American Musicological Society (2010) 63 (3): 652–658. https://doi.org/10.1525/jams.2010.63.3.652 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Grayson Wagstaff; Review: Imposing Harmony: Music and Society in Colonial Cuzco by Geoffrey Baker. Journal of the American Musicological Society 1 December 2010; 63 (3): 652–658. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/jams.2010.63.3.652 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentJournal of the American Musicological Society Search This content is only available via PDF. © 2010 by the American Musicological Society. All rights reserved.2010 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Musicological SocietySame topicLatin American history and cultureFrench-language works237,207