MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A phase II trial of motexafin gadolinium (MGd) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who had failed platinum-based chemotherapy: Preliminary results of stage 1

2007· article· en· W2275927258 on OpenAlexaff
Garth Nicholas, Ronald B. Natale, F. Anthony Greco, Ramaswamy Govindan, Pierre Chabot, K. J. Pandya, Lane Eubank, Markus F. Renschler

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
Canadian institutionsOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineOncologyLung cancerRegimenChemotherapyGastroenterologyAdenocarcinomaChemotherapy regimenGemcitabineCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

18001 Background: Motexafin gadolinium (MGd) is a tumor-selective antineoplastic agent that disrupts redox dependent pathways by targeting oxidative stress-related proteins such as thioredoxin reductase (TRX). TRX often is overexpressed in NSCLC and is associated with a poor prognosis. Inhibition of TRX reverses tumor phenotype in lung carcinoma cells in vitro and in vivo. This randomized 2-stage phase II trial investigated tumor response and survival with 2 regimens of single agent MGd for the 2nd line treatment of advanced NSCLC. Methods: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC ± brain metastases, ECOG PS 0–1, who had received one prior platinum-based chemotherapy regimen ± kinase inhibitor were randomized to intravenous MGd (10 mg/kg/week - Group A) or MGd (15 mg/kg/q 3 weeks - Group B) given in 21 day cycles. The sample size was 30 per arm in stage 1, and 24 per arm in stage 2. Response was evaluated by RECIST every 6 weeks. Results: 51 evaluable patients, median age of 62 years (range 41–85), with locally advanced (14%) or metastatic (86%) adenocarcinoma (47%), squamous cell carcinoma (14%), large cell carcinoma (10%), bronchoalveolar carcinoma (2%) or other NSCLC (27%) were randomized to group A (N=22) or group B (N=29). 37% had not responded to first line chemotherapy. MGd treatment was well tolerated, with 1–12 cycles (median 2, mean 3) administered. The most common grade 3+ adverse events were hypophosphatemia (15.7%), fatigue (13.7%), dyspnea (9.8%), hypoxia (7.8%), and finger blisters (5.9%). 48 patients were evaluable for response, with a confirmed response rate of 4.2% (2 PR). Median time to progression was 7 weeks in each group, with 26% and 15% free from progression at 4 and 6 months, respectively. Median survival of 51 evaluable patients was 10.2 months (95% CI: 6.7 months - not reached), 9.2 months for group A and not reached at > 1 year for group B. Conclusions: MGd appears active as a single agent for second line treatment of NSCLC patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC who have failed prior platinum-based chemotherapy, with a modest response rate and promising survival. The trial has met the criteria for continuation into stage 2 for each treatment group. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.479
Teacher spread0.406 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207