MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2276036188 · doi:10.1161/str.44.suppl_1.awmp24

Abstract WMP24: Thrombolysis within 48 hours after Basilar Artery Occlusion

2013· article· en· W2276036188 on OpenAlexaff
Perttu J. Lindsberg, Daniel Strbian, Tiina Sairanen, Markku Kaste

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineThrombolysisModified Rankin ScaleConcomitantStroke (engine)InfarctionBasilar arteryInternal medicineSurgeryAnesthesiaCardiologyIschemic strokeMyocardial infarctionIschemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Recanalization therapies and their time window in basilar artery occlusion (BAO) remain empirical and vary among hospitals. Our institutional protocol for BAO does not follow the strict RCT-guided guidelines in hemispheric stroke, and advices thrombolysis up to 12 hours after sudden onset of severe symptoms, and 48 hours after onset of gradually progressing symptoms, provided that extensive infarction changes have not yet occurred. Objective: The aim was to analyse the importance of two fundamental variables, symptom duration and the extent of baseline infarction, on the outcome of thrombolysis-treated BAO. Methods: We prospectively gathered data from 184 consecutive patients with angiography-proven BAO in the Helsinki University Central Hospital, which receives all candidates for stroke thrombolysis in a catchment area of 1.5 million. We took advantage of frequent non-adherence to our management protocol and grouped patients according to "protocol violations" (PVs): exceeded symptom duration (time PV) and large-infarct PV. Patients were divided into 4 categories based on onset-to-treatment time (OTT). Intravenous alteplase (0.9 mg/kg) and concomitant full-dose heparin was administered in the majority of patients. Outcome variables were recanalization of BA, 3-month modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and 1-year mortality. Results: Patients with no PV had the best outcome (when recanalized, 51% had good outcome [mRS 0-2], and 62% were non-dependent [mRS 0-3]), followed by patients with time PV (42% and 58%, respectively). Over 90% of patients with large-infarct PV were dependent, institutionalized, or dead (mRS 4-6), even when recanalized. Compared with 37% in patients with no PV, 1-year mortality was higher in patients with both PVs (68.8%, p<0.05) and large-infarct PV (64.7%, p<0.01); but similar to patients with time PV (45.5%, p=0.61). Importantly, the outcome of recanalized BAO was similar among OTT categories. Conclusions: In the absence of extensive baseline infarct signs, recanalization of BAO up to 48 hours was seldom futile (mRS 4-6) and produced non-dependent outcomes in 60% of patients, which was virtually independent of the exact time window. We recommend a dedicated protocol for BAO in stroke patients screened for thrombolysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management→French-language works237,207→