Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article discusses peculiarities of Joseph Boyden‘s novel «ThreeDay Road» psychohistoric code. Psychohistory of the novel is analyzed underthe concept of national character and the history of its formation. Paperexplores the psychohistory as an organizing construct for examining theories ofhuman development in the text of «Three Day Road». Various aspects ofimperialistic models of thinking represented in the novel are discussed alongwith the aspects of knowledge about human development from two points –mainstream Eurocentric paradigm, that is dominant in the society, as well asfrom First Nations‘ of Canada worldview. Perspectives on indigenous wisdomand ways of knowing are presented from national psychocode linking humandevelopment concerns to a holistic view of human development. The articlehighlights modern aspects of the First Nations‘ literary traditions which deepenunderstanding of parallels in Cree national character development throughsynthesis of national conscientious and un-conscientious. For the first time thepsychoanalytical theory is combined with actualization of Cree nationalcharacter evolution problems in the text analysis of Joseph Boyden‘s ―ThreeDay Road‖. The article focuses on determination of imperialistic and nationalentity codes in the text of the novel which are demonstrated upon differentlevels such as psychological, language, world outlook as well as religionperspectives. Theories about different stages of human development represented in maternal and parental codes and knowledge about assets thatfacilitate positive development of national subject at each stage of positivedevelopment in the novel are presented. Idea of national character formation inthe novel supports development that maintains positive adaptation to achanging world, and can provide a description of human development theoryfrom the perspective of traditional Aboriginal knowledge.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".