MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2276297183

LOWELL and NELB, Architectural Records: Managing Design and Construction Records

2007· article· en· W2276297183 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Linda Fraser

Bibliographic record

VenueArchivaria · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBIM and Construction Integration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistorical recordHistoryArchitectural engineeringEngineeringArt history
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Design and construction records provide critical documentary evidence of society in surprising ways.More than just a record of how a building was designed and built, they document the development of our towns and cities, societal and cultural trends, power structures, economic forces, and artistic endeavour.But because of their very format, architectural records are often surrounded by a mystique.They have a language of their own and their information is both visual and technical.Complex in nature, they are often comprised of multiple media, and the physical size of the records and the sheer volume of collections can intimidate or scare those who are entrusted with their care.The similarities with other types of records may not be immediately evident, and the dif ferences may seem to pose insurmountable challenges.Architectural Records: Managing Design and Construction Records, published by the Society of American Archivists in 2006, sets out to demystify design and construction records, and to provide a comprehensive manual for their care.The authors, Waverly Lowell and Tawny Ryan Nelb, obviously have substantial experience in dealing with records of this kind, and their knowledge and passion for the field is evident.Their goal in writing this book is to provide archivists and others char ged with the care of architectural records with the knowledge and skills needed to or ganize, store, handle, and preserve them with confidence.In order to accomplish this goal, they have produced a very ambitious work with a western architectural historical context, that progresses logically through each stage of the record' s life cycle: it examines who creates architectural records, how and why they are created, and how they can best be processed, preserved, and accessed.Divided into eight chapters, and accompanied by a gallery of colour images and three appendices, this book carefully and thoroughly details architectural practice, the creation of architectural records and their various types, and issues surrounding appraisal, arrangement and description, preservation, and research and use.Beautifully illustrated and well-organized,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.928
Threshold uncertainty score0.478

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchivariaSame topicBIM and Construction IntegrationFrench-language works237,207