Bibliographic record
Abstract
pinquity Revisited: Communications Technology and the Transformation of the Urban Public Sphere.’’ Sociological Inquiry 68(3):373–397. Castells, Manuel. 1997. The Power of Identity. London: Blackwell Publishers. Coleman, Gabriella E. 2012. Coding Freedom: The Ethics and Aesthetics of Hacking. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Coleman, Gabriella E. 2014. Hacker, Hoaxer, Whistleblower, Spy: The Many Faces of Anonymous. New York: Verso. Dauvergne, Peter, and Genevieve LeBaron. 2014. Protest Inc.: The Corporatization of Activism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. Downing, John. 2001. Radical Media: Rebellious Communication and Social Movements. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. Earl, Jennifer, and Katrina Kimport. 2011. Digitally Enabled Social Change: Activism in the Internet Age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Fisher, Dana. 2006. Activism, Inc.: How the Outsourcing of Political Campaigns is Strangling Progressive Politics in America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Harcourt, Bernard E. 2013. ‘‘Political Disobedience.’’ Pp. 45–92 in Occupy: Three Inquiries in Disobedience, edited by W. J. T. Mitchell, B. E. Harcourt, and M. Taussig. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Hick, Steven, and John G. McNutt, eds. 2002. Advocacy and Activism on the Internet: Perspectives from Community Organization and Social Policy. Chicago: Lyceum Books. Jordan, Tim, and Paul Taylor. 2004. Hacktivism and Cyberwars: Rebels with a Cause. New York: Routledge. Lievrouw, Leah A. 2011. Alternative and Activist New Media. London: Polity. Meyer, David S., and Sidney G. Tarrow. 1998. The Social Movement Society: Contentious Politics for a New Century. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. Ramos, Howard, and Kathleen Rodgers, eds. 2015. Protest and Politics: The Promise of Social Movement Societies. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press. Rheingold, Howard. 1993. The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Samson, Robert J., Doug McAdam, Heather MacIndoe, and Simon WefferElizondo. 2005. ‘‘Civil Society Reconsidered: The Durable Nature and Community Structure of Collective Civic Action.’’ American Journal of Sociology 111(3): 673–714. Walker, Edward. 2015. Grassroots for Hire: Public Affairs Consultancy in American Democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Wellman, Barry. 1997. ‘‘An Electronic Group Is Virtually a Social Network.’’ Pp. 179–205 in Culture of the Internet, edited by S. Kiesler. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Wellman, Barry. 2004. ‘‘The Three Ages of Internet Studies: Ten, Five and Zero Years Ago.’’ New Media and Society 6(1):123–129. Whalen, Jack, and Richard Flacks. 1990. Beyond the Barricades: The Sixties Generation Grows Up. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Whittier, Nancy. 1995. Feminist Generations: The Persistence of the Radical Women’s Movement. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Wolfson, Todd. 2014. Digital Rebellion: The Birth of the Cyber Left. Champaign: University of Illinois Press. Yang, Guobin. 2009. The Power of the Internet in China: Citizen Activism Online. New York: Columbia University Press.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.021 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.032 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.016 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.015 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.032 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".