An experimental investigation of impingement heat transfer in a rib-roughened trailing-edge channel with crossover holes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A modern day turbine blade for a typical gas turbine usually contains rib roughened cavities which increases the cooling rate. There are several methods of cooling which include the impingement cooling method, the film cooling method, and the rib roughened cooling method. The trailing edge cooling cavity is focused in this study to provide a more efficient combination of the ribs to cool down the section. The trailing edge cooling cavity of a typical gas turbine blade is modeled and put into a laboratory setting. There were eight different geometries tested, where the angle of the cross over holes, exit holes and the ribs were modified for each experiment. The angle of the cross over holes were varied between two selections, 0 degrees or 5 degrees, the alignment of the cross over holes and the exit holes were either inline or staggered, 2 or 4 exit holes were blocked, and the ribs were either present or not present. For each geometry setting, six Reynolds numbers were tested from 11,000 to 36,000. Liquid crystal thermography was used to measure the heat transfer coefficient on a target surface. The variance of the Nusselt Number versus the Reynolds Number are compared for the different geometries and flow arrangements throughout the entire experimentation. The typical results show that the Nusselt Number increases as the Reynolds Number increases. For the experiment with the exit holes blocked, the heat transfer coefficients with the blocked holes were lower than the heat transfer coefficients with the open holes. It was also found that the case of the 5 degree tilt, inline flow arrangement with no bleed had the best heat transfer performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".