Ca<sup>2+</sup>binding to cardiac troponin C: effects of temperature and pH on mammalian and salmonid isoforms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A reduction in temperature lowers the Ca(2+) sensitivity of skinned cardiac myofilaments but this effect is attenuated when native cardiac troponin C (cTnC) is replaced with skeletal TnC. This suggests that conformational differences between the two isoforms mediate the influence of temperature on contractility. To investigate this phenomenon, the functional characteristics of bovine cTnC (BcTnC) and that from rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, a cold water salmonid (ScTnC), have been compared. Rainbow trout maintain cardiac function at temperatures cardioplegic to mammals. To determine whether ScTnC is more sensitive to Ca(2+) than BcTnC, F27W mutants were used to measure changes in fluorescence with in vitro Ca(2+) titrations of site II, the activation site. When measured under identical conditions, ScTnC was more sensitive to Ca(2+) than BcTnC. At 21 degrees C, pH 7.0, as indicated by K(1/2) (-log[Ca] at half-maximal fluorescence, where [Ca] is calcium concentration), ScTnC was 2.29-fold more sensitive to Ca(2+) than BcTnC. When pH was kept constant (7.0) and temperature was lowered from 37.0 to 21.0 degrees C and then to 7.0 degrees C, the K(1/2) of BcTnC decreased by 0.13 and 0.32, respectively, whereas the K(1/2) of ScTnC decreased by 0.76 and 0.42, respectively. Increasing pH from 7.0 to 7.3 at 21.0 degrees C increased the K(1/2) of both BcTnC and ScTnC by 0.14, whereas the K(1/2) of both isoforms was increased by 1.35 when pH was raised from 7.0 to 7.6 at 7.0 degrees C.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".