MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2276751037 · doi:10.1149/ma2014-01/43/1650

Multi-Electrode Configurations for Electrochemical Measurements

2014· article· en· W2276751037 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Eugene Newton Moss, Ruben Nelson, Pedro L. Moss, Mark H. Weatherspoon

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicElectrochemical Analysis and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPotentiostatReference electrodeElectrodeAnodeHorizontal scan rateElectrochemistryWorking electrodeStandard hydrogen electrodeStandard electrode potentialCyclic voltammetryQuinhydrone electrodeMaterials sciencePalladium-hydrogen electrodeAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Sodium sulfateCathodeSilver chlorideAbsolute electrode potentialPlatinumElectrode potentialChemistrySodiumMetallurgyCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multiple electrodes for standard electrochemical measurements can provide appropriate results depending on the system. Two electrode measurements are common in such systems where the interactions between the anode and the cathode are of interest, such as in batteries. It is beneficial to understand the capability of three electrode measurements, since this configuration can provide accurate data on a single electrode of interest with respect to a third reference electrode in any system, like in aqueous solution. The cyclic voltammetry (CV) measurements were performed by the Solartron 1287 at a scan rate of 50 mV/s on a system where a platinum metal counter electrode and a Teflon rod with a circular, planar glassy carbon surface working electrode were immersed in a solution of 0.5 M sodium sulfate (Na2SO4). The EIS measurements were performed by the VersaStat 4 potentiostat on an identical system. The two electrode CV in Figure 1 show various potentials where anodic and cathodic peaks occur, indicating the presence of oxidation and reduction reactions [1]. The fact that there appears to be two peaks on the voltammogram at about -0.4 V during the forward scan and -0.5 V during the reverse scan suggests that this process is reversible or quasi-reversible [2]. For comparison, a third electrode, a silver/silver chloride (Ag/AgCl) reference electrode, is introduced to the system and a CV is performed, with the results shown in Figure 2. During the forward scan, the peak at -0.4 V in Figure 1 is hardly visible in the Figure 2 measurement, potentially indicating that there is no significant reaction at the working electrode, although it must be considered that the peak in Figure 1 is a much smaller current density scale. The -0.5 V peak on the reverse scan remains, albeit resulting in a different current density. Hence, a possible conclusion can be made in that a change in the rate of reaction at the working electrode is present. The EIS measurements in Figure 3 show the comparison of the impedance of two different electrodes using a three electrode system. The impedance measurements were performed using the same electrode setup that was used in the three electrode CV measurements. As expected, the impedance of the carbon electrode was much greater than that of the platinum electrode across the spectrum, especially away from the high frequency end. Acknowledgment This work was supported by the FREEDM ERC program of the National Science Foundation under award number EEC-08212121. References 1. Linden, David, and Thomas B. Reddy. Handbook of Batteries. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2002. Print 2. Jan C. Myland, Keith B. Oldham. Quasi-reversible Cyclic voltammetry of a surface confined redox system: a mathematical treatment. Ont. Canada. 2005

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.166

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0500.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicElectrochemical Analysis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207