Multi-Electrode Configurations for Electrochemical Measurements
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Multiple electrodes for standard electrochemical measurements can provide appropriate results depending on the system. Two electrode measurements are common in such systems where the interactions between the anode and the cathode are of interest, such as in batteries. It is beneficial to understand the capability of three electrode measurements, since this configuration can provide accurate data on a single electrode of interest with respect to a third reference electrode in any system, like in aqueous solution. The cyclic voltammetry (CV) measurements were performed by the Solartron 1287 at a scan rate of 50 mV/s on a system where a platinum metal counter electrode and a Teflon rod with a circular, planar glassy carbon surface working electrode were immersed in a solution of 0.5 M sodium sulfate (Na2SO4). The EIS measurements were performed by the VersaStat 4 potentiostat on an identical system. The two electrode CV in Figure 1 show various potentials where anodic and cathodic peaks occur, indicating the presence of oxidation and reduction reactions [1]. The fact that there appears to be two peaks on the voltammogram at about -0.4 V during the forward scan and -0.5 V during the reverse scan suggests that this process is reversible or quasi-reversible [2]. For comparison, a third electrode, a silver/silver chloride (Ag/AgCl) reference electrode, is introduced to the system and a CV is performed, with the results shown in Figure 2. During the forward scan, the peak at -0.4 V in Figure 1 is hardly visible in the Figure 2 measurement, potentially indicating that there is no significant reaction at the working electrode, although it must be considered that the peak in Figure 1 is a much smaller current density scale. The -0.5 V peak on the reverse scan remains, albeit resulting in a different current density. Hence, a possible conclusion can be made in that a change in the rate of reaction at the working electrode is present. The EIS measurements in Figure 3 show the comparison of the impedance of two different electrodes using a three electrode system. The impedance measurements were performed using the same electrode setup that was used in the three electrode CV measurements. As expected, the impedance of the carbon electrode was much greater than that of the platinum electrode across the spectrum, especially away from the high frequency end. Acknowledgment This work was supported by the FREEDM ERC program of the National Science Foundation under award number EEC-08212121. References 1. Linden, David, and Thomas B. Reddy. Handbook of Batteries. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2002. Print 2. Jan C. Myland, Keith B. Oldham. Quasi-reversible Cyclic voltammetry of a surface confined redox system: a mathematical treatment. Ont. Canada. 2005
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.050 | 0.025 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".