Corrections to finite-size scaling in the φ4 model on square lattices
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Corrections to scaling in the two-dimensional (2D) scalar [Formula: see text] model are studied based on nonperturbative analytical arguments and Monte Carlo (MC) simulation data for different lattice sizes L ([Formula: see text]) and different values of the [Formula: see text] coupling constant [Formula: see text], i.e. [Formula: see text], 1, 10. According to our analysis, amplitudes of the nontrivial correction terms with the correction–to–scaling exponents [Formula: see text] become small when approaching the Ising limit ([Formula: see text]), but such corrections generally exist in the 2D [Formula: see text] model. Analytical arguments show the existence of corrections with the exponent [Formula: see text]. The numerical analysis suggests that there exist also corrections with the exponent [Formula: see text] and, perhaps, also with the exponent about [Formula: see text], which are detectable at [Formula: see text]. The numerical tests provide an evidence that the structure of corrections to scaling in the 2D [Formula: see text] model differs from the usually expected one in the 2D Ising model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it