EXAMEN DE POSGRADO ENLAZA CU, JURIQUILLA Y ALBERTA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
EN LA UNAM SE REALIZO UN EXAMEN DOCTORAL A TRAVES DE UNA VIDEOCONFERENCIA QUE ENLAZO TRES PUNTOS: LA SALA DEL CONSEJO DE LA COORDINACION DE ESTUDIOS DE POSGRADO, EN CIUDAD UNIVERSITARIA; EL INSTITUTO DE NEUROBIOLOGIA, CAMPUS JURIQUILLA, QUERETARO, Y LA UNIVERSIDAD DE ALBERTA, CANAD , DESDE DONDE LA MAESTRA Y HOY DOCTORA EN CIENCIAS BIOMEDICAS, MARIA ELIZABETH GARCIA PLASCENCIA, PRESENTO SU INVESTIGACION MEDIADA POR CITO ESQUELETO, SENALIZACION DE LA FILAMINA COMO INTEGRADOR DE MECANISMOS Y SENALES CELULARES. LOS SINODALES ASIGNADOS POR EL COMITE ACADEMICO FUERON LOS SIGUIENTES INVESTIGADORES: EN EL CAMPUS JURIQUILLA, COMO PRESIDENTE: MAURICIO DIAZ MUNOZ, DEL INSTITUTO DE NEUROBIOLOGIA; EN CIUDAD UNIVERSITARIA, COMO VOCALES: RUY ENRIQUE PEREZ MONTFORT, DEL INSTITUTO DE FISIOLOGIA CELULAR; ANGEL ZARAIN HERZBERG, DE LA FACULTAD DE MEDICINA, Y GLORIA ACACIA BENITEZ KING, DEL INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PSIQUIATRIA; Y, POR ULTIMO, EN LA UNIVERSIDAD DE ALBERTA, COMO SECRETARIO DEL JURADO Y TUTOR DE MARIA ELIZABETH GARCIA: DAVID JOHN JAY GOMEZ-FARIAS, DEL INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE CARDIOLOGIA. GUSTAVO BLANCAS ACEVEDO, JEFE DE LA UNIDAD DE DESARROLLO DE SISTEMAS, DE LA COORDINACION DE ESTUDIOS DE POSGRADO, LOCALIZADA EN CU, DIJO QUE AUNQUE SON COMUNES LAS VIDEOCONFERENCIAS EN LA UNAM, PARA LA REALIZACION DE ESTA SE DEBIERON SUPERAR ALGUNAS DIFICULTADES TECNICAS, LAS CUALES DETALLA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".