JUDICIAL REVIEW INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT SECURITY SYSTEM IN INDONESIA IN ORDER: CRIMINAL NO PIRACY PREVENTION AND IMPLEMENTATION IN AIRCRAFT INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MINANGKABAU
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Aircraft piracy offenses are offenses that endanger the security penerbangan. Bandar Minangkabau International Airport plays an important role in the prevention of the crime of aircraft hijacking . The formulation of the problem raised is how the arrangement of international airport security systems and aircraft piracy offenses in International and National ? and how the implementation of international airport security systems in order to prevent the crime of aircraft hijacking in BIM ? . This thesis uses methods of sociological laws are based on primary and secondary data sources were processed qualitatively . Of the thesis is concluded that the setting Security Systems International Airport and the National internationally regulated , among others : Annex 17 of the International Civil Aviation Organization , Security , Document 9246 ATS Planning Manual of Security and Facility Security Personnel , Law No. 1 of 2009 on the flight , Prime Minister of Transportation Regulation Number 31 Year 2013 on National Aviation Security Programme . Internationally , the criminal act is governed by three airlines , namely the International Convention on the Tokyo Convention (1963 ) , Hague Covention (1970 ) , and the Montreal Convention (1971 ) . With the ratification of the three conventions through Law No. 2 of 1976, the Indonesian government issued Law No. 4 of 1976 on the Amendment and the addition of several articles in the Criminal Code of Crimes and Crimes Against Flight Facilities / Infrastructure Flight . In the prevention of the crime of hijacking aircraft , BIM Security Officers conduct an examination of all persons and goods , especially the passengers , baggage , object carried in the hand , mail , cargo before it is loaded into the aircraft . This is to prevent the entry of dangerous goods (dangerous goods) illegally to the aircraft which can lead to a crime of Aircraft hijacking. Keywords : security system , Prevention , Piracy , airport . Daftar Pustaka Buku-buku Achmad Moegandi, Mengenal Dunia Penerbangan Sipil, Sinar Harapan, Jakarta,1996. Boer Mauna, Hukum Internasional (Pengertian, Peranan dan Fungsi Dalam Era Dinamika Global), Alumni, Bandung. 2000. Djoko Prakoso, Tindak Pidana Penerbangan di Indonesia, Ghalia Indonesia. Jakarta, 1984. E Suherman, Hukum Udara Indonesia dan Internasional, Alumni, Bandung. 1983. I Wayan Parthiana, Pengantar Hukum Internasional, Mandar Maju, Bandung. 1990. Martono, Pengantar Hukum Udara Nasional dan Internasional, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta 2012. Mochtar Kusumaatmadja dan Etty R. Agoes, Pengantar Hukum Internasional. Alumni, Bandung. 2003. Moeljatno, Asas-asas Hukum Pidana, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta. 1993. Priyatna Abdurrasyid, Kedaulatan Negara di Ruang Udara, Pusat Penelitian Hukum Angkasa (Air & Space Law Research Centre), Jakarta. 1972. Soejono Soekanto, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Universitas Indonesia Press. Jakarta. 1986. Sudradjat M Bassar, Tindak-tindak Pidana Tertentu di Dalam Kitab Undang- undang Hukum Pidana, Remadja Karya, Bandung. 1984. Zainal Abidin A Farid, Hukum Pidana 1, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta. 1995.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".