MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2277117513 · doi:10.2138/am-2000-0124

A new anhydrous amphibole from the Eifel region, Germany: Description and crystal structure of obertiite, NaNa <sub>2</sub> (Mg <sub>3</sub> Fe <sup>3+</sup> Ti <sup>4+</sup> )Si <sub>8</sub> O <sub>22</sub> O <sub>2</sub>

2000· article· en· W2277117513 on OpenAlexafffund
F. C. Hawthorne, Mark A. Cooper, Joel D. Grice, Luisa Ottolini

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Mineralogist · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsCanadian Museum of NatureUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPleochroismCrystallographyCrystal structureMonoclinic crystal systemOrthorhombic crystal systemChemistryAegirineMineralogyMaterials scienceQuartz

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Obertiite is a new amphibole species from Bellerberg, Laccher See district, Eifel, Germany. It occurs with tridymite, fluororichterite, hematite, rutile, aegirine-augite, kinoshitalite, and fluor-apatite in vugs in volcanic rocks, and crystallized from late-stage hydrothermal fluids associated with recent volcanism. Obertiite occurs as pale-pink elongated blades and divergent aggregates. It is brittle, H = 5, D calc = 3.16 g/cm 3 , has a colorless streak, vitreous luster, and does not fluoresce; it has perfect cleavage on {110} and conchoidal fracture. In plane-polarized light, obertiite is slightly pleochroic in shades of pink to red-orange; X ^ a = 2° (in β obtuse), Z = b, Y ^ c = 12° (in b obtuse) with absorption X ~ Y ~ Z. It is biaxial negative, α = 1.643(1), β =1.657(1), γ = 1.670(3), 2V x = 81(1)°, no dispersion visible. Obertiite is monoclinic, space group C2/m, a = 9.776(2), b = 17.919(3), c = 5.292(1) Å, b = 104.05(2)°, V = 899.3(3) Å 3 , Z = 2. The strongest ten X-ray diffraction lines in the powder pattern are [d(I,hkl)]: 8.414(10,110), 2.705(7,331,151), 3.390(6,131), 4.467(5,040), 3.117(5,310), 2.531(5,202), 3.255(3,240), 2.577(3,061), 2.163(3,171,261), 4.013(2,111). Analysis by a combination of electron microprobe, SIMS, and crystal-structure refinement gives SiO 2 54.53, Al 2 O 3 0.15, TiO 2 7.75, Fe 2 O 3 2.61, Mn 2 O 3 3.27, FeO 3.36, ZnO 0.08, MgO 14.13, Li 2 O 0.05, CaO 0.52, Na 2 O 9.51, K 2 O 0.98, F 0.55, H 2 O 0.20, O ≡ F -0.23, Ni, Cr, V, Cl not detected, sum 97.46 wt%. The formula unit, calculated on the basis of 24(O,OH,F) is (K 0.18 Na 0.84 )(Na 1.86 Ca 0.08 Fe 2+ 0.06 ) (Mg 3.09 Zn 0.01 Li 0.03 Fe 3+ 0.29 Mn 3+ 0.37 Fe 2+ 0.41 Ti 4+ 0.86 Al 0.03 )Si 8.00 O 22 [(OH) 0.20 F 0.26 O 1.54 ], and is close to the ideal endmember composition Na Na2 (Mg 3 Fe 3+ Ti 4+ ) Si 8 O 22 O 2 . The crystal structure of obertiite was refined to an R index of 2.6% using MoKa X-ray intensity data. The M1 site is split into two subsites along the b axis, M1 and M1A; the M1 site is occupied by Mg, and M1A is occupied predominantly by Ti 4+ and Mn 3+ ; M2 is occupied by Mg, Fe 2+ , and Fe 3+ , and M3 is occupied by Mg. Local bond-valence considerations suggest that O 2- at O3 is linked to Ti 4+ Mg or Mn 3+ Mn 3+ at the adjacent M1 and/or M1A sites, and that OH or F at O3 is linked to MgMg at the adjacent M1 sites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican MineralogistSame topicCrystal Structures and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207