MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2277117864 · doi:10.1017/cjn.2015.117

Child Neurology (General Pediatric Neurology)

2015· article· en· W2277117864 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Annie Bernier, JS Landry, AS Kristof, Lionel Carmant, Philippe Major

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEthics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpilepsyMedicineTuberous sclerosisNeurologyMedical prescriptionPediatricsDemographicsPopulationHealth carePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is a neurocutaneous syndrome that can present with many disabling neurological symptoms, the most common being seizures. Although it is a chronic systemic syndrome, healthcare utilization and long-term outcome of subjects with TSC are not well defined. The goal of this study was to evaluate the direct cost and long-term outcome of TSC compared to other forms of epilepsy and healthy controls. Methods: Our provincial health care database was interrogated to determine use of medical services by patients with TSC, epilepsy and healthy controls from 1996-2011. Data on demographics, outcomes and health care utilization were analyzed. Results: 1004 TSC, 41,934 with epilepsy and 41,934 controls were identified. The prevalence of TSC was 1/7,872 compared to 1/189 for epilepsy. TSC experienced more hospitalizations, medical visits and prescription drug use, resulting in higher total health care costs. Their most common admission diagnosis was seizures and age at death was significantly lower: 61,3 years old for TSC vs 69,6 and 76,6 years old for epilepsy and controls, (p<0,001). Conclusions: TSC subjects have a significantly higher burden of disease than other subjects with epilepsy. These results stress the need for specialized services in this population through the lifespan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.191

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0570.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques→Same topicEthics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare→French-language works237,207→