MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2277227020 · doi:10.4095/296685

The petrology, mineralization, and regional context of the Thunder mafic to ultramafic intrusion, Midcontinent Rift, Thunder Bay, Ontario

2015· report· en· W2277227020 on OpenAlexaffabout
Bruna Trevisan, Pete Hollings, D E Ames, N M Rayner

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThunderUltramafic rockGeologyMaficIntrusionRiftGeochemistryBayMineralization (soil science)Context (archaeology)PetrologyOceanographySeismologyPaleontologyTectonicsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 1108 Ma Thunder mafic to ultramafic intrusion is a small, 800 x 100 x 500 m, Cu-PGE mineralized body, located on the outskirts of Thunder Bay, Ontario. It is associated with the early magmatic stages of the Midcontinent Rift based on geochemical similarities to mafic and ultramafic rocks of the Nipigon Embayment and a 207Pb/206Pb zircon age of 1108.0 ± 1.0 Ma. The Thunder intrusion is similar to other known mineralized early-rift Midcontinent Rift intrusions; however, it is the only known occurrence of the Midcontinent Rift hosted in an Archean greenstone belt (Shebandowan). Major textural and geochemical differences can be used to subdivide the intrusion into a lower mafic to ultramafic unit and an upper gabbroic unit; the similar trace and rare earth element ratios of the two units suggest a single magmatic pulse that has undergone subsequent fractional crystallization and related cumulate phase layering. The estimated parental composition of the Thunder intrusion has a Mg# (MgO/(MgO+FeOTot), mole%) of 57, which represents a more evolved magma than other early-rift mafic to ultramafic intrusions and may indicate multiple staging chambers during the ascent of the parent magma. Trace and rare earth element patterns are consistent with a mantle plume ocean island basalt-like source but with high-Th concentrations and a negative Nb anomaly. The ?Ndt values of the intrusion range between -0.7 and +1.0, with no trends indicative of progressive wall-rock contamination, whereas the 87Sr/86Sri ratios range from 0.70288 to 0.70611 and trend towards wall-rock values of between 0.70712 and 0.70873. The radiogenic Sm-Nd and Rb-Sr isotope signature is similar to the contamination trends of the Nipigon sills, which is interpreted to represent contamination by shallow-basin-filling sedimentary rocks. Ni-Cu-PGE sulphide mineralization (20 m of 0.22 wt% Cu, 0.06 wt% Ni, 0.25 ppm Pt, and 0.29 ppm Pd) is hosted by feldspathic peridotite in the lower mafic to ultramafic unit adjacent to the footwall rock of the Thunder intrusion. Sulphides typically comprise 1 to 5 modal%, rarely up to 30 modal%, with textures ranging from medium- to fine-grained, disseminated, globular, and rarely net-textured. Pyrrhotite, chalcopyrite, and rare pentlandite, with common secondary marcasite-pyrite replacement, occur together with trace michenerite, kotulskite, merenskyite, sperrylite, hessite, electrum, and argentian pentlandite. Wholerock geochemical data display fractionated Ni-Cu-PGE patterns with depletion of iridium subgroup relative to the platinum subgroup. Sulphide d34S values from the Thunder intrusion range from -2.0 to +3.8 per mil and are similar to values for the metavolcanic host rock, which range from -3.1 to +2.3 per mil. Two samples of the basal mineralization zone sulphides yield d33S values of 0.066 and 0.122 per mil and one sample of the metavolcanic wall rock yields 0.149 per mil. The d34S and d33S values for the Thunder intrusion fall within range for rocks of typical upper mantle composition. The sulphur source is difficult to resolve. It appears to be of mantle origin as the wallrock S isotope values and S/SeTot signature are similar to that of upper mantle; however, assimilation of crustal sulphur is also a possibility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score0.153

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207