MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

(8886) Elaeagnus

2003· book-chapter· en· W2277688869 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhytochemical and Pharmacological Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForestryGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the invasive species which is currently naturalized in the Altai Region is Russian olive of the genus Elaeagnus. The results of its invasive distribution have been a research subject in many countries in the recent 20 years. The investigation of flood-plain vegetation of the Milk River (North Montana, the USA-Canada border) revealed that having appeared in the river valley, Russian olive occupied the native species’ habitats very quickly and formed monocenosis. The research purpose involves the examination of vegetation transformation in the Altai Region consisting in new plant communities appearance as a result of anthropogenic influence. The research objective is the study of Russian olive communities as a new element of vegetation in the Kulundinskaya steppe. The analysis of literature data has shown that the history of the genus Elaeagnus species’ invasion in the Altai Region dates back to the 1920s. Field studies of 2012 show that Russian olive communities became an environment component in the steppe area of the Region. Six associations with Elaeagnus angustifolia L. have been described; in five of them the genus Elaeagnus dominates. The occurrence of Elaeagnus angustifolia increases in the Kulundinskaya steppe from east to west. This species is a drought-resistant glycohalophyte, and having a high osmotic pressure due to soluble sugars in cells it is able to adapt to arid and saline soils. A further investigation of the genus Elaeagnus species’ naturalizing is required to monitor the consequences of its distribution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhytochemical and Pharmacological StudiesFrench-language works237,207