Technology Adoption and the Accountability Factor: A Case for the Re-Intermediation of Travel Agencies in Small Island Developing States
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper highlights the importance of trust and accountability to Caribbean consumers of online travel products. It reveals a critical element, which has been largely ignored in the literature related to travel consumer online purchasing decisions. Previous research on factors that influence consumer decisions about online travel purchase tended to focus on so called universal factors such as speed, convenience and cost, to name a few, while those that promote more traditional offline purchasing surround expertise, social interaction, privacy and security. While these cannot be overlooked, this work highlights that an important factor in the decision making process is the ability to hold persons accountable and depend on organizations to see their booking through to a successful end. This is particularly heightened if and when errors in bookings are made. A mixed-methods approach was used in this paper. The process began with 31 in-depth interviews with the Chief Executive Officers of all owner-managed travel agencies in Jamaica. Given that the Caribbean countries bear some similarities, a cross-national survey totaling 302 individuals was conducted between Jamaican and the Bahamas over a three (3) week period. The findings not only reveal that accountability is important to consumers in relationship-oriented societies such as Jamaica and the Bahamas, but that this concept must be explored for other countries and contexts, particularly for those interested in maintaining the buoyancy of travel agencies in a technologically advanced world.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".