Increased glucose tolerance in Type II Diabetics treated with a citrus extract: A pilot study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diabetinol™, a dietary supplement, was tested in a placebo controlled clinical trial for its ability to improve the glucose tolerance of subjects when presented with a standard oral glucose challenge. Subjects were males and females between the ages of 18 and 75 with fasting glucose levels between 109.8mg/dl and 162mg/dl. Twenty subjects were randomly assigned to 2 treatment groups and received either Diabetinol™ (2x525mg/day) or a placebo (2x525mg/day) for 84 days. Control data was collected on day 0 and was compared against experimental data collected on days 28, 56 and 84 of the study. A significant (p<0.01) 19% reduction in glucose intolerance was observed in the Diabetinol™ treatment group after 84 days while no significant changes were observed in the placebo group. No statistically significant changes to the fasting plasma glucose or hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels of either group were observed during this study; however, a downward trend was seen in the HbA1c levels of Diabetinol™‐treated subjects. These results suggest that when administered over a longer treatment period, Diabetinol™ significantly reduces glucose intolerance in individuals with Type II Diabetes. Additional studies on the efficacy of Diabetinol™ in Type II Diabetics will be conducted in a larger sample population over a 6‐month treatment period.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".