Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acquainted in some way with nearly every contemporary figure mentioned in this book, Samuel Taylor Coleridge presents a rewarding case for the study of early Romantic religious Dissent and dissident publicity. From Cambridge in 1794 to his departure for Germany in 1798, Coleridge's Unitarianism informed his fundamental conceptions of community first in the Pantisocracy scheme, the Bristol lectures, and The Watchman and then, most enduringly, in the experimental conversation poems which followed. Religious Dissent, however, has too uniformly been applied as a primary context for Coleridge's early development. His Unitarian nonconformity, on the contrary, needs to be understood as in important ways opposed to the public sphere of heterodox Dissenters presented in this study. The public in which Coleridge's radically egalitarian forms of communication would take place developed both within and against the middle-class Dissenting culture opened to Coleridge by his Unitarian beliefs, writings, and oratory. Throughout the first half of the eighteenth century “old Dissent” comprised the three major denominations of Presbyterians, Independents, and Baptists, but by the end of the century Unitarianism and “new Dissent,” Methodism, had augmented the ranks of nonconformity. The Evangelical Revival, furthermore, was beginning to spread from Methodism, especially from Calvinistic Methodism, as well as from Evangelical elements within the Church of England, to energize the older denominations, the orthodox branches in particular.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".