Nonmonotonic piezoresistive effect in elastomeric composite films
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT We compared the change of electrical resistance with elongation (piezoresistive effect) in thin films made of conductive multiwalled carbon nanotubes embedded in eight different elastomers. Two distinct forms of piezoresistive effect were observed: (i) in the “monotonic” (M) case, the film resistance always increased with the applied strain; (ii) the “nonmonotonic” (NM) case showed an initial increase in the resistance, while with further elongation the resistance began to decrease. By varying the amount of nitrile and/or styrene groups in the polymer matrix one can alter the piezoresistive effect qualitatively: composites with ∼25 wt % or more of nitrile or styrene functional side groups exhibited M piezoresistance, while others, with no, or methyl side groups only, showed NM piezoresistance. Influence of the second filler (either conductive carbon black or nonconductive nanoclay) in the ternary composites on the piezoresistive effect was explored. The possibility to modify the piezoresistive behavior of the conductive elastomer composites, for example, via chemical modification of the polymeric matrix, opens up a new venue for practical applications such as diverse types of sensors and, in NM case, complex dynamical systems (bistable elements, electromechanical oscillators, etc.) in the MEMS field. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016 , 133 , 43518.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".