Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article examines the turn of two postcolonial Algerian writers, Assia Djebar and Mourad Djebel, to the frame narrative of Alf Layla wa Layla, or 1001 Nights, as a critical template for exploring contradictions for social and political agency in the postcolonial public sphere. I argue that although both authors rewrite the figure of Shahrazad for distinct thematic purposes, their works intersect in the extent to which the figuration of the feminine, or the production of woman as a representation of authentic cultural identity, establishes an aporia that must be worked through in postcolonial critiques of gendered legacies of colonial and nationalist violence. I examine three approaches to this problematic in Assia Djebar's novel Ombre Sultane, as well as her short story Femme en Morceaux, and in Mourad Djebel's novel Cinq et Une Nuits de Shahrazede to establish how these texts negotiate the literary inheritance of Alf Layla wa Layla as a textual corpus that in its nonlocalizable and infinitely disseminating status establishes a possible counter narrative to attempts to consolidate identity in orientalist and nationalist imaginaries. However Alf Layla wa Layla's imbrication in the fantasies underpinning colonial conquest as well as the contradictory impetus for creative agency embodied in the production of narrative under a threat of death is taken into account by Djebar and Djebel to suggest that their turn to Alf Laya wa Layla is premised upon the contradictions underpinning the history of the text and its interpretation. The critical reinstantiation of the frame narrative by Djebar and Djebel reveals the tensions underwriting the ambiguity of Shahrazad's status as a feminist heroine to suggest a series of impasses in Femme en Morceaux and Les Cinq et Une Nuits, and an emergent possible for feminine agency in Ombre Sultane.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".