Residential Schools: The Intergenerational Impacts on Aboriginal Peoples
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many authors, historians and researchers concur with the idea \nthat residential schools have impacted generation after generation of \nAboriginal Peoples in this country. In the late nineteenth and early \ntwentieth centuries, the federal government wanted Aboriginal peoples \nto abandon their traditional beliefs and adopt western-based values \nand religions. The investigation of the role and impacts of residential \nschools on Aboriginal traditional knowledge and mental, emotional, \nphysical and spiritual well-being must be studied within the context \nof colonization and genocide. Residential schools were funded by the \nfederal government, but were operated by various religious institutions. \nThe goal of residential schools was institutionalized assimilation by \nstripping Aboriginal peoples of their language, culture and connection \nwith family. Although the assaults on the first peoples of this land \nhave been devastating and intergenerational, as discussed within this \narticle, it is with pride that we celebrate the resilience and tenacity of \nthe holistic well-being of Aboriginal peoples. We are still here.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".