MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

TNFα compromises the inner ear microcirculation in a sphingosine kinase 1/sphingosine‐1‐phosphate dependent manner ‐ a novel mechanism for sudden hearing loss (SHL)

2010· article· en· W2278501559 on OpenAlexaff
Elias Q. Scherer, H. J. Yang, K. Ivanov, Christian Diehl, Katrin Reimann, Philine Wangemann, Ulrich Pohl, Martin Canis, Sebastian Strieth, Julia Voigtlaender‐Bolz, Darcy Lidington, Steffen‐Sebastian Bolz

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Canadian institutionsHeart and Stroke FoundationUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrocirculationInner earSphingosine-1-phosphateMedicineSphingosineSphingosine kinaseSphingosine kinase 1Cell biologyInternal medicinePathologyAnatomyBiologyReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study establishes a link between inflammation and inner ear vascular dysfunction. Recovery of auditory function in of SHL patients treated with a TNFα inhibitor were consistent with a vascular origin. We investigated the inner ear microcirculation using (1) an in vitro model of the spiral modiolar artery (SMA), the end artery feeding the inner ear, (2) intra vital microscopy of stria vascularis (SV) perfusion, and (3) in vitro measurement of cochlear lateral wall capillary (LWC) constriction. We demonstrate that in all parts of the cochlear microcirculation (SMA, SV and LWC), TNFα induces a proconstrictive state via activation of sphingosine‐1‐phosphate (S1P). Analysis of the molecular signalling pathway identified the phosphorylation of sphingosine kinase 1 (the S1P generating enzyme activated by TNFα) as a new therapeutic target for SHL. We conclude that any pathology linked to the release of TNFα has the potential to reduce cochlear blood flow and cause SHL. The present study integrates SHL into the family of cardiovascular pathologies, with immediate implications related to risk stratification, diagnosis and treatment. CIHR‐MOP‐84402, CFI‐11810, ORF‐11810, CSN, KRICRF‐TUM‐8758155, HSFO‐NI, HSFO‐CI, SFUT, Boehringer Ingelheim, DAA, NIH‐R01‐DC04280.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics→French-language works237,207→