Divergent Effects of Infliximab and Anakinra Therapies on Macrophage Phenotype from Patients with Refractory Rheumatoid Arthritis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previously, we documented the co-expression of the inducible nitric oxide synthase (NOS2) and protein kinase C-eta (PKC-eta) in peripheral blood-derived macrophages (PBDM) from moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with elevated plasma nitric oxide levels but not from those with non-inflammatory osteoarthritis (OA) or normal plasma NO levels. The presence of PKC-eta was found to be required before macrophages could acquire the NOS2-positive phenotype and make copious levels of NO. In the current study, we report the divergent effects of two biological-based RA therapies which target TNFalpha function (infliximab) or IL1 response (anakinra) on the development of the NOS2-positive phenotype by PBDM in patients with refractory RA. Both infliximab and anakinra were effective in improving disease symptoms. However, treatment with anakinra, but not infliximab led to a complete suppression of NOS2 expression in PBDM and consequently, a more pronounced reduction in plasma NO levels. Data also revealed a requirement of both TNF-alpha and IL-1 in the development of the NOS2-positive macrophage phenotype. Finally, the data have shed light on the molecular mechanisms by which NO production may be regulated during disease progression to severe RA, and thus, offer a novel insight into the identification of future therapeutic targets for the treatment of inflammatory diseases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".