Novel mechanisms in murine nitrofen-induced pulmonary hypoplasia: FGF-10 rescue in culture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We evaluated the role of the key pulmonary morphogenetic gene fibroblast growth factor-10 (Fgf10) in murine nitrofen-induced primary lung hypoplasia, which is evident before the time of diaphragm closure. In situ hybridization and competitive RT-PCR revealed a profound disturbance in the temporospatial pattern as well as a 10-fold decrease in mRNA expression level of Fgf10 but not of the inducible inhibitor murine Sprouty2 (mSpry2) after nitrofen treatment. Exogenous FGF-10 increased branching not only of control lungs [13% (right) and 27% (left); P < 0.01] but also of nitrofen-exposed lungs [23% (right) and 77% (left); P < 0.01]. Expression of mSpry2 increased 10-fold with FGF-10 in both nitrofen-treated and control lungs, indicating intact downstream FGF signaling mechanisms after nitrofen treatment. We conclude that nitrofen inhibits Fgf10 expression, which is essential for lung growth and branching. Exogenous FGF-10 not only stimulates FGF signaling, marked by increased mSpry2 expression, in both nitrofen-treated and control lungs but also substantially rescues nitrofen-induced lung hypoplasia in culture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".