Bibliographic record
Abstract
St. John's harbor is located on the Northeast coast of the Avalon Peninsula on the Island of Newfoundland. During the summer and fall of 1999 and 2000, two continuous observational program were carried out in order to determine the circulation in the Narrows of the harbor and the influence of external forcing from Avalon Channel. Observational current data in both years show that the axial current in the Narrows has a two-layer vertical structure. A strong seasonal bottom outflow was found in the center of the Narrows in both years, and it keeps strongest in August and September. Empirical Orthogonal Function (EOF) analysis applied to the axial subtidal currents in 2000 shows that mode 1 contains over 40% of the total variance and mode 2 contains 27% of the total variance. Coherence analysis result indicates that mode 1 represents the influence from local wind stress and mode 2 represents the effect from external force outside the harbor. Comparison between observation current and wind speed shows that wind force has a direct influence on the surface current and a counter influence on the current in the lower layer. The result of a two-layer barotropical model driven by wind forcing shows a high correlation with EOF mode 1. The counter effect of wind force on the lower layer also occurs in the model, and can be explained as the conservation of the volume in the harbor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".