MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Inhibition of tumor growth in a murine xenograft model by thalidomide

2006· article· en· W2280019140 on OpenAlexaff
Leora Horn, Matthias Hermes, Joerg Schwock, Marc Brulport, Jan G. Hengstler

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineThalidomideAngiogenesisRadiation therapyChemotherapyCancer researchUrologyInternal medicineMultiple myeloma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

20083 Background: Limitations in the treatment of recurrent disease in cervical carcinoma are for radiation therapy large tumor size and pelvic side wall involvement and for exenteration procedurde previous radiation therapy, bulky disease, and others. Alternative approaches including chemotherapy, chemo-radiation, radiation plus hyperthermia and others are accompanied by a failure rate of 50 to 80%. Recent research has shown that the antineoplastic effect of thalidomide (TD) is due to the inhibition of neo-angiogenesis, a decrease of TNF-a, blocking of nuclear factor κβ-kinase activity, stimulation of the IL-2 and downregulation of cell adhesion molecules. Here, we have studied the effect of TD on a cervical cancer cell line in a murine xenograft model. Methods: We injected 7 × 106 HELA cells s.c. into the dorsal skin of 6–8 week-old male nude mice (cd nu−/nu−; Charles River, Sulzfeld, Germany). The tumor diameter was measured with a caliber rule. The maximum and minimum diameters of the tumor were determined. Tumor volume (V) was calculated by the formula: V = a × b × b/2, where a represents the minimum and b the maximum tumor diameter. As soon as tumors reached a volume of 0.25 cm3 the mice were randomized into a treatment (n = 9) and a control group (n = 9). The mice in the treatment group received 14 daily injections of 300 mg/kg (i.p.) thalidomide for 14 days. Animals were housed under specific pathogen-free conditions. The experiments have been approved by the local animal welfare committee. Results: Thalidomide caused a clear delay in tumor growth. Already 7 days after onset of thalidomide therapy the mean tumor volume was smaller in the treated (0.24 ± 0.03 cm3) compared to the control mice (0.73 ± 0.15 cm3; mean ± standard error; p < 0.01). After 14 days of thalidomide treatment the mean tumor volumes were 0.37 ± 0.05 and 1.05 ± 0.19 cm3 in the treated and in the control mice, respectively (p < 0.01). However, after the end of the 14 days treatment period a new onset of tumor growth was observed. In conclusion, thalidomide delayed tumor growth but did not cause tumor remission. Conclusions: TD is effective in inhibition of tumor growth of a cervical cancer cell line in a mouse xenograft model and might be an alternative drug in patients with recurrent cervical carcinoma without any options for established standard therapy. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.136
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicHepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis→French-language works237,207→