Transformation Textures in As‐hot rolled TRIP Steels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The microstructures of TRIP steels finish‐rolled above and below the recrystallization‐stop temperature (Tnr) are compared. Here, the retained austenite grains are equiaxed or elongated, respectively, according to whether final rolling was carried out above or below the Tnr. The recrystallized austenite did not contain a sharp texture, the best defined component of which was the cube. The bainite that formed in this case was characterized by weak concentrations of the Goss and rotated Goss and a fairly strong concentration of the rotated cube. It also displayed the transformation products of a retained rolling fibre in the prior austenite. The deformed austenite contained the typical fcc rolling texture, where the copper is considerably more intense than the brass under these conditions. After transformation to bainite, the presence of a strong transformed copper component is evident, together with somewhat less intense contributions from the three transformed brass components. The data indicate that strong variant selection took place in the deformed austenite and that it was also present in the recrystallized material, but to a lesser extent. The latter displayed evidence of incomplete recrystallization in that the transformation texture included components obtained from both “recrystallized” and “deformed” austenite.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".