MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2280302694 · doi:10.1097/pcc.0000000000000506

Stimulant Toxicity in Children

2015· article· en· W2280302694 on OpenAlexaff
Hossein Hassanian‐Moghaddam, Maryam Ranjbar, Fariba Farnaghi, Nasim Zamani, Afshin Mohammad Alizadeh, Saeedeh Sarjami

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Critical Care Medicine · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicForensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
Canadian institutionsChild, Adolescent and Family Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMethamphetamineStimulantMydriasisEcstasyMethylphenidateInterquartile rangeToxicityPediatricsAnesthesiaOdds ratioAttention deficit hyperactivity disorderInternal medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the signs/symptoms of different stimulant toxicities in children to determine differences among them. DESIGN: Observational, retrospective, single-center case-series. SETTING: The only referral hospital for pediatric poisoned patients in Tehran, Iran, covering 12.5 million permanent and 6.5 million temporary residents. PATIENTS: All children between 2007 and 2012 were evaluated. Their clinical findings, laboratory tests, electrocardiogram, and outcome were evaluated. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 147 patients were enrolled (115, 24, three, and five with methamphetamine, methylphenidate, ecstasy, and unknown stimulant toxicities, respectively). Median (interquartile range) age of the methamphetamine- intoxicated children (16 mo [22-42 mo]) was significantly less than those with methylphenidate toxicity (66 mo [33-105 mo]). Almost 79% of the patients had ingested the stimulant, whereas 9% had passively been exposed to the methamphetamine smoke. The frequency of stimulant toxicity had significantly increased during the 5-year period of the study. Restlessness, mydriasis, stereotypic movements, and talkativeness were the most common signs and symptoms. Whereas bruxism only seen in 66.7% (95% CI, 21-94%) of ecstasy users, the prevalence of restlessness, sweating, and tremor was also more in this group of children. On the other hand, mydriasis and stereotypic movements were more common in crystal-meth patients by 76.5% (95% CI, 68-83%) and 53% (95% CI, 44-62%), respectively. A comparison between different routes of crystal-meth intoxication showed that flushing was more common in those who had passively/actively smoked/inhaled methamphetamine (odds ratio, 6.3 [95% CI, 1.5-26]). Palpitation was more seen in methylphenidate toxicity by 12.5% (95% CI, 4-31%). Restlessness was more detected in toddlers, whereas talkativeness and ataxia were more common in older children. Nineteen children (21%) had prolonged QTc according to normal values in different ages. None of them died. CONCLUSIONS: More studies are warranted to evaluate the frequency and outcome of this poisoning in children. Educational preventive programs are also recommended.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.190
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.451
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric Critical Care MedicineSame topicForensic Toxicology and Drug AnalysisFrench-language works237,207