MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2280647713 · doi:10.1161/str.45.suppl_1.2

Abstract 2: Extensive Collateral Recruitment after Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke is Associated with Symptomatic Intracranial Haemorrhage

2014· article· en· W2280647713 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Leonard L.L. Yeo, Prakash Paliwal, Hock Luen Teoh, Raymond C.S. Seet, Bernard P.L. Chan, Rahul Rathakrishnan, Kay Wei Ping Ng, Bharatendu Chandra, Amit Batra, Benjamin R. Wakerley, Jonathan Ong, Venetia Ong, Gavin Hock Tai Lim, Eric Ting, Vijay K. Sharma

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineThrombolysisScoring systemMiddle cerebral arteryRadiologyCollateral circulationStroke (engine)Computed tomographicCollateralInternal medicineCardiologyComputed tomographyIschemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Various collateral channels are recruited to provide alternative pathways in acute ischemic stroke (AIS), however the relationship with patient outcomes remain unclear. We compared various existing methods of scoring collaterals on the pre-treatment and day-2 computed tomographic angiogram (CTA) of the brain in thrombolyzed AIS patients. Methods: We included 115 consecutive patients in whom CTA was performed both pre-tPA and on day-2. Intracranial collaterals were evaluated by 2 independent neuroradiologists using 4 existing and one modified method- Miteff’s system (grades middle cerebral artery (MCA) collateral branches with respect to sylvian fissure); Maas system (compares collaterals in affected hemisphere against the contralatral side); Modified Tan’s scale (collaterals in 50% or more of MCA territory classified as good); and 20-point collateral grading scale by Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score (ASPECTS) methodology. For the modified scoring system we adapted ASPECTS methodology into a 14 point score for cortical and internal cerebral veins (ICV) and removing basal ganglia area from scoring. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) was defined by new bleeding on the CT scan and an increase in NIH stroke scale (NIHSS) by 4 points or more. Results: On univariate analysis collateral recruitment via the Tan scoring system, ASPECTS method (improvement of ≥6 points), modified scoring system (improvement ≥7 points), hypertension and higher NIHSS score were associated with SICH. On multivariate analysis only collateral recruitment on the Tan scoring system (OR 3.286 95% CI 1.014-11.025, p =0.049), Collateral recruitment on ASPECTS ≥6 points (OR 2.839 95% CI 1.064- 7.576, p = 0.037) and collateral recruitment on the modified scoring system ≥ 7 (OR 4.174 95% CI 1.212-14.372, p = 0.023) were independent predictors of SICH. Interestingly, collateral failure on the day-2 CTA did not show any association with SICH. Conclusion: Large recruitment of the collateral channels on the day-2 CTA is strongly associated with SICH after thrombolysis . Perhaps, an unregulated cerebral hyperperfusion contributed to SICH and close monitoring along with aggressive blood pressure control might prevent complications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management→French-language works237,207→