MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2280658732

Using seismic data to delineate tectonic and depositional features within the Springer Formation, Blaine, Canadian and Caddo counties, Oklahoma

2014· article· en· W2280658732 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSHAREOK (University of Oklahoma; Oklahoma State University; Central Oklahoma University) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyTectonicsSedimentary depositional environmentSeismologyPhysical geographyGeomorphologyGeographyStructural basin
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Springer interval in an area of the eastern Anadarko Basin was analyzed using a 3D seismic dataset. The purpose was to determine if 3D could effectively image the rock volume between well control points. Specifically the study was designed to test the ability of 3D seismic to delineate tectonic features such as faults and depositional features such as thick sandstone bodies that are potential gas reservoirs. Seismic was also utilized to improve the stratigraphic framework by utilizing extensive marine shale deposits and the truncation of the Springer section against the Pennsylvanian unconformity. Synthetic seismograms were created and found to be effective in correlating to several different stratigraphic units. Seismic data was able to effectively define structural attitude of beds, and was able to identify faults, internal stratigraphic thickness and channel-like features. RMS amplitudes were able to identify features seen on isochron maps and enhanced the view of the channel-like features. Channel-like features in the Chester Limestone to Morrow Base interval have a northwest to southeast trend, whereas in the Morrow Base to Novi Limestone interval, the channel-like features trend northeast to southwest. Channels were confirmed using seismic sections and well logs. Seismic sections show the apparent angular unconformity at the Morrow Base. Subsequent basinal subsidence may have affected the trends of Morrow channels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.872
Threshold uncertainty score0.257

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.171
Teacher spread0.150 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSHAREOK (University of Oklahoma; Oklahoma State University; Central Oklahoma University)Same topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207