MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2281018647 · doi:10.2524/jtappij.69.1309

Promotion of Energy Conservation Activities in a Paperboard Mill

2015· article· en· W2281018647 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJAPAN TAPPI JOURNAL · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMaterial Properties and Processing
Canadian institutionsMiller Group (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPaperboardPDCAPulp and paper industryPromotion (chess)MillEnergy conservationPaper millEnvironmental scienceChemistryWaste managementEngineeringOperations managementMechanical engineeringPolitical scienceQuality management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

レンゴーでは,「軽薄炭少」を環境経営のキーワードとして,より軽く薄く,CO2排出量の少ないパッケージづくりに取り組んでいる。それは,段ボールの製品開発から始まり,各製造工程や輸送工程での省エネ推進に至るが,八潮工場でも板紙工場として提供できる新商品開発,マシン改造(設備投資),そして小集団による取り組みを通じて省エネに心掛けてきた。特に小集団活動では従来の手法に変え,コンサルタントを招へいして原理原則とエネルギー収支の検証,最新技術情報の収集と具体化,これらを推進する組織・人材の育成,といった柱を掲げ,各職場から若手中心のメンバーを選抜し実行力のある組織として省エネサークルを結成した。活動では単に立案だけでなく,継続的な省エネルギーを実施する「体制」及び「手順」の構築に力を入れ,PDCAサイクルによる継続的な活動を目指し,全員参加型の草の根活動による省エネ活動を実践した。その事例を紹介することで平成26年度省エネ大賞経済産業大臣賞を拝受したが,今回は受賞講演を基に八潮工場での取り組み内容を紹介する。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.198
Threshold uncertainty score0.214

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it