MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2281119841

Timing cystectomy and perioperative chemotherapy in the treatment of muscle invasive bladder cancer.

2006· article· en· W2281119841 on OpenAlexaff
Jonathan I. Izawa, Joseph L. Chin, Eric Winquist

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCystectomyBladder cancerPerioperativeChemotherapyStage (stratigraphy)Lymph nodeTransitional cell carcinomaNeoadjuvant therapyOncologyUrologyInternal medicineSurgeryCancerBreast cancer
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: The ability of cystectomy to cure patients with muscle-invasive transitional carcinoma of the bladder (TCC) is diminished by the presence of occult micrometatases. Chemotherapy contributes to cure to the extent that it may eradicate these micrometastases. In the absence of methods to preoperatively stage TCC precisely or assess tumor biology, we review the current literature regarding the timing of cystectomy and use of perioperative chemotherapy. Based on this data, we suggest optimal and feasible strategies for treating TCC in a resource-constrained environment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Systematic reviews of TCC were sought using electronic databases to obtain optimal information about: 1) the relationship between TNM stage and survival, 2) the effect of surgical waiting times on tumor stage and survival outcomes, 3) the benefits of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy, and 4) the patients who benefit most from perioperative chemotherapy. RESULTS: Prospective data from the largest contemporary series of patients treated with cystectomy confirmed long-term survival in patients with extravesical and/or lymph node disease of 25%-47% at 5 years and 17%-27% at 10 years. Lymph node involvement was more common in patients with extravesical tumors. Retrospective studies of the effect of delay to cystectomy on outcomes showed higher tumor stage and reduced survival with delay of cystectomy beyond 12 weeks. Two individual patient data meta-analyses, including all currently available randomized controlled trials (RCTs), comparing neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy to local therapy alone confirmed that overall survival is modestly improved by cisplatin-based combination neoadjuvant chemotherapy. None of these RCTs showed a detrimental effect of delaying cystectomy for this treatment. Tumor status at cystectomy appears to correlate with overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: We propose immediate use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients suspected of having extravesical TCC. As most have micrometatastases, immediate surgery is less critical. For patients suspected of having organ-confined TCC, immediate cystectomy is recommended with adjuvant chemotherapy recommendations based on pathological staging. If surgery within 12 weeks is not possible for these patients, neoadjuvant chemotherapy with monitoring of response can be used. Improved preoperative staging and understanding of tumor biology are required to optimize the multimodality treatment of TCC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→Same topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments→French-language works237,207→