MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2281136567 · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/820/2/90

PERSISTENT ASYMMETRIC STRUCTURE OF SAGITTARIUS A* ON EVENT HORIZON SCALES

2016· article· en· W2281136567 on OpenAlexafffund
Vincent L. Fish, Michael D. Johnson, Sheperd S. Doeleman, Avery E. Broderick, Dimitrios Psaltis, Ru-Sen Lu, Kazunori Akiyama, W. Alef, Juan Carlos Algaba, Keiichi Asada, Christopher Beaudoin, Alessandra Bertarini, Lindy Blackburn, R. Blundell, Geoffrey C. Bower, Christiaan D. Brinkerink, R. J. Cappallo, Andrew Chael, Richard Chamberlin, G. Crew, Jason Dexter, Matt Dexter, Sergio A. Dzib, H. Falcke, R. Freund, Per Friberg, Christopher H. Greer, Mark Gurwell, Paul T. P. Ho, Mareki Honma, Makoto Inoue, Tim Johannsen, Junhan Kim, T. P. Krichbaum, James W. Lamb, J. León-Tavares, Abraham Loeb, Laurent Loinard, David H. E. MacMahon, Daniel P. Marrone, J. M. Moran, Monika Mościbrodzka, Gisela N. Ortiz-León, Tomoaki Oyama, Feryal Özel, R. L. Plambeck, Nicolas Pradel, Rurik A. Primiani, A. E. E. Rogers, Katherine Rosenfeld, Helge Rottmann, A. L. Roy, C. Ruszczyk, D. L. Smythe, Jason Soohoo, Justin Spilker, Jordan Stone, P. A. Strittmatter, R. P. J. Tilanus, Michael Titus, Laura Vertatschitsch, Jan Wagner, J. F. C. Wardle, Jonathan Weintroub, D. P. Woody, M. C. H. Wright, Paul Yamaguchi, André Young, Ken Young, J. A. Zensus, L. M. Ziurys

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversity of TorontoPerimeter InstituteUniversity of Waterloo
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceScience and Technology Facilities CouncilArmy Research OfficeDirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoSmithsonian InstitutionNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaInstitut Périmètre de physique théoriqueIndustry CanadaAcademia SinicaNational Science FoundationGovernment of CanadaSmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryGordon and Betty Moore FoundationMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
KeywordsSagittarius A*PhysicsAstrophysicsGalactic CenterEvent horizonAsymmetrySchwarzschild radiusAstronomyAmplitudeMillimeterAngular resolution (graph drawing)Extinction (optical mineralogy)Supermassive black holeEvent (particle physics)GalaxyOpticsAccretion (finance)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The Galactic Center black hole Sagittarius A* (Sgr A*) is a prime observing target for the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT), which can resolve the 1.3 mm emission from this source on angular scales comparable to that of the general relativistic shadow. Previous EHT observations have used visibility amplitudes to infer the morphology of the millimeter-wavelength emission. Potentially much richer source information is contained in the phases. We report on 1.3 mm phase information on Sgr A* obtained with the EHT on a total of 13 observing nights over four years. Closure phases, which are the sum of visibility phases along a closed triangle of interferometer baselines, are used because they are robust against phase corruptions introduced by instrumentation and the rapidly variable atmosphere. The median closure phase on a triangle including telescopes in California, Hawaii, and Arizona is nonzero. This result conclusively demonstrates that the millimeter emission is asymmetric on scales of a few Schwarzschild radii and can be used to break 180° rotational ambiguities inherent from amplitude data alone. The stability of the sign of the closure phase over most observing nights indicates persistent asymmetry in the image of Sgr A* that is not obscured by refraction due to interstellar electrons along the line of sight.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.608
Threshold uncertainty score0.388

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations88
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical JournalSame topicAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsFrench-language works237,207